首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >The use of RapidArc volumetric-modulated arc therapy to deliver stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy to intracranial and extracranial targets
【24h】

The use of RapidArc volumetric-modulated arc therapy to deliver stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy to intracranial and extracranial targets

机译:使用RapidArc容积调制弧光疗法向颅内和颅外目标进行立体定向放射外科手术和立体定向人体放射治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Twenty-three targets in 16 patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were analyzed in terms of dosimetric homogeneity, target conformity, organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing, monitor unit (MU) usage, and beam-on time per fraction using RapidArc volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. multifield sliding-window intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patients underwent computed tomography simulation with site-specific immobilization. Magnetic resonance imaging fusion and optical tracking were incorporated as clinically indicated. Treatment planning was performed using Eclipse v8.6 to generate sliding-window IMRT and 1-arc and 2-arc RapidArc plans. Dosimetric parameters used for target analysis were RTOG conformity index (CI RTOG), homogeneity index (HI RTOG), inverse Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), D mean and D5-D95. OAR sparing was analyzed in terms of D max and D mean. Treatment delivery was evaluated based on measured beam-on times delivered on a Varian Trilogy linear accelerator and recorded MU values. Dosimetric conformity, homogeneity, and OAR sparing were comparable between IMRT, 1-arc RapidArc and 2-arc RapidArc plans. Mean beam-on times ± SD for IMRT and 1-arc and 2-arc treatments were 10.5 ± 7.3, 2.6 ± 1.6, and 3.0 ± 1.1 minutes, respectively. Mean MUs were 3041, 1774, and 1676 for IMRT, 1-, and 2-arc plans, respectively. Although dosimetric conformity, homogeneity, and OAR sparing were similar between these techniques, SRS and SBRT fractions treated with RapidArc were delivered with substantially less beam-on time and fewer MUs than IMRT. The rapid delivery of SRS and SBRT with RapidArc improved workflow on the linac with these otherwise time-consuming treatments and limited the potential for intrafraction organ and patient motion, which can cause significant dosimetric errors. These clinically important advantages make image-guided RapidArc useful in the delivery of SRS and SBRT to intracranial and extracranial targets.
机译:分析了16例接受立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)或立体定向身体放疗(SBRT)的患者的23个靶标,包括剂量均匀性,靶标一致性,危险器官(OAR)保留,监测器(MU)使用以及使用RapidArc体积调制弧光疗法(VMAT)与多场滑动窗口强度调制放射疗法(IMRT)的每个部分的束流开启时间。患者进行了具有特定部位固定的计算机断层扫描模拟。临床上已纳入磁共振成像融合和光学跟踪。使用Eclipse v8.6执行了治疗计划,以生成滑动窗口IMRT以及1弧和2弧RapidArc计划。用于目标分析的剂量参数为RTOG合格指数(CI RTOG),均匀性指数(HI RTOG),帕迪克逆指数(PCI),D均值和D5-D95。根据D max和D均值分析OAR保留。根据在Varian Trilogy线性加速器上测得的束通时间和记录的MU值,评估治疗的执行时间。在IMRT,1-弧RapidArc和2-弧RapidArc计划之间,剂量学上的一致性,同质性和OAR备用相当。 IMRT以及1弧和2弧治疗的平均束开时间±SD分别为10.5±7.3、2.6±1.6和3.0±1.1分钟。 IMRT,1-和2-arc计划的平均MU分别为3041、1774和1676。尽管这些技术之间的剂量学一致性,同质性和OAR保留相似,但与IMRT相比,用RapidArc处理的SRS和SBRT馏分的束开时间和MU少得多。采用RapidArc的SRS和SBRT的快速交付通过这些原本费时的治疗方法改善了直线加速器的工作流程,并限制了分馏器官和患者运动的可能性,这可能导致明显的剂量学误差。这些临床上的重要优势使图像引导的RapidArc可用于将SRS和SBRT输送至颅内和颅外靶标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号