首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Beyond health plans: behavioral health disorders and quality of diabetes and asthma care for Medicaid beneficiaries.
【24h】

Beyond health plans: behavioral health disorders and quality of diabetes and asthma care for Medicaid beneficiaries.

机译:超出健康计划的范围:行为健康障碍以及对Medicaid受益人的糖尿病和哮喘护理质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Most health insurance plans monitor ambulatory care quality using the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), publicly reporting results at the plan level. Plan-level comparisons obscure the influence of patients served or settings where care is delivered. Mental illness, substance abuse, and other physical comorbidities, particularly prevalent among Medicaid beneficiaries, can impact adherence to recommended care. We analyzed individual-level HEDIS measures for diabetes and asthma from 5 Medicaid managed care plans to understand how these factors contribute to quality. METHODS: We used claims and medical records to study HEDIS measures for persistent asthma (n = 9103) and diabetes (n = 1790) among beneficiaries enrolled in Massachusetts' Medicaid program during 2004 and 2005. Logistic regression models included patient-level demographic and health factors, provider type, region, and managed care plan. RESULTS: Alcohol and drug use disorders and emergency department use were associated with lower quality care for most measures. Glycemic control was better for patients with diabetes and severe mental illness. Patients with higher illness burden and with more frequent ambulatory visits received higher quality care for both conditions. Younger adults received recommended care less often than older adults. Quality varied across plans. CONCLUSIONS: Additional efforts to improve quality of care for asthma and diabetes for Medicaid beneficiaries are needed for individuals with substance use disorders and young adults. Although evidence of higher quality for patients with multiple conditions is encouraging, improving quality for comparatively healthier individuals might also produce significant long-term benefits.
机译:背景:大多数健康保险计划都使用医疗保健有效性数据和信息集(HEDIS)来监控门诊护理质量,并在计划级别上公开报告结果。计划级别的比较掩盖了所服务患者或提供护理的环境的影响。精神疾病,药物滥用和其他身体合并症,尤其是在医疗补助受益人中普遍流行,会影响对推荐护理的依从性。我们从5个Medicaid管理的护理计划中分析了针对糖尿病和哮喘的个人级HEDIS措施,以了解这些因素如何影响质量。方法:我们使用索赔和医疗记录研究了2004年和2005年参加马萨诸塞州医疗补助计划的受益人中持续性哮喘(n = 9103)和糖尿病(n = 1790)的HEDIS措施。Logistic回归模型包括患者水平的人口统计学和健康状况因素,提供者类型,地区和管理式医疗计划。结果:大多数措施中,酗酒和吸毒障碍以及急诊科的使用与较低质量的护理有关。糖尿病和重度精神疾病患者的血糖控制效果更好。疾病负担高且门诊就诊频率更高的患者在这两种情况下均获得了更高质量的护理。与成年人相比,年轻人较少接受推荐的护理。计划之间的质量参差不齐。结论:对于患有药物滥用疾病的个体和年轻人,需要做出更多的努力来改善医疗补助受益人的哮喘和糖尿病护理质量。尽管令人鼓舞的是,多种情况患者的质量更高的证据令人鼓舞,但相对健康的个体而言,提高质量可能也会产生重大的长期利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号