首页> 外文期刊>Fundamental and applied limnology >Assessing the status of marl lakes under the European Union Water Framework Directive - insights from contemporary and palaeolimnological studies of three English lakes
【24h】

Assessing the status of marl lakes under the European Union Water Framework Directive - insights from contemporary and palaeolimnological studies of three English lakes

机译:根据欧盟水框架指令评估泥灰湖的状况-来自对三个英国湖泊的当代和古湖泊学研究的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Methods for ecological status assessment of high-alkalinity lakes under the Water Framework Directive (WED) differ between continental Europe and the UK. In the UK, marl lakes, i.e. carbonate-precipitating lakes, are placed in a separate category in which metrics account for the naturally low phosphorus content and sensitive macrophyte communities found therein. If this separation is appropriate, the UK method, which applies a correction factor for stricter assessment of marl lakes, should assess ecological status more effectively. Using contemporary macrophyte and chlorophyll-a data, this supposition was assessed for three English lakes by calculating ecological status with and without the correction factor. The veracity of the results was assessed using palaeolimnological and historical surveys. Further, the potential of macrophyte maximum colonisation depth (C-max) as an additional metric was investigated. For two lakes, the status suggested by historical-palaeolimnological data was poorer (Moderate) than that suggested by WED classification, both with and without the correction factor (Good and/or High). This has important implications as restoration is required only for water bodies classed below Good. For the third lake, for which high chlorophyll-a resulted in Poor status in agreement with historical-palaeolimnological data, the discrepancy between the macrophyte metrics with and without the correction factor was considerable (Poor, Moderate, respectively). The results suggest that a separate marl lake category is warranted and may be advisable for other Member States in continental Europe. Importantly, status was higher than recommended for the two lakes close to the Good/Moderate boundary even with the correction factor. This leads us to recommend more studies be undertaken on eutrophication responses of marl lakes. In lakes where macrophyte species composition varies with water depth, eutrophication is apparent through reductions in C-max especially of Characeae and Potamogetonaceae. C-max is simple to measure and may much improve the reliability of marl lake assessment.
机译:在欧洲大陆和英国之间,根据水框架指令(WED)进行高盐度湖泊生态状况评估的方法有所不同。在英国,泥灰湖(即碳酸盐沉淀湖)被放在一个单独的类别中,其中的度量标准说明了其中天然低磷含量和敏感的大型植物群落。如果这种分离是适当的,则英国方法采用校正因子以更严格地评估泥灰湖,应更有效地评估生态状况。使用当代大型植物和叶绿素-a数据,通过计算有无校正因子的生态状况,对三个英国湖泊进行了这种假设评估。结果的准确性是通过古生物学和历史调查评估的。此外,研究了大型植物最大定殖深度(C-max)作为附加指标的潜力。对于两个湖泊,无论有没有校正因子(好和/或高),历史古湖泊学数据所建议的状况都比WED分类所建议的状况差(中等)。这具有重要的意义,因为仅对归类为“良好”的水体才需要进行修复。对于第三个湖泊,其高的叶绿素-a导致状态差,与历史古微生物学数据相符,带有和不带有校正因子的大型植物指标之间的差异相当大(分别为“差”,“中等”)。结果表明,有必要对沼泽湖进行单独分类,这对于欧洲大陆的其他成员国可能是明智的。重要的是,即使有校正因子,其状态也比接近良好/中度边界的两个湖泊的状况要好。因此,我们建议对沼泽湖的富营养化响应进行更多的研究。在大型植物种类组成随水深变化的湖泊中,富营养化是通过降低C-max来实现的,特别是Characeae和Potamogetonaceae的C-max降低。 C-max易于测量,并且可以大大提高泥灰湖评估的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号