...
首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >Keeping the pieces together: comparison of mass grave excavation methodology.
【24h】

Keeping the pieces together: comparison of mass grave excavation methodology.

机译:将各个部分放在一起:大量坟墓挖掘方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Mass graves are a complex and confusing mix of bodies, body parts, soils, artifacts, and other feature evidence. Forensic investigations of these complex crime scenes should attempt to maximize the collection of evidence, which includes the mortal remains, in their best possible condition as they were deposited within the graves. Two standard methods of mass grave excavation were examined with the aim of identifying the better approach. Two experienced teams using different methodologies excavated two separate but very comparable mass graves located in the same area. Single disarticulated skeletal elements not associated with a body at the time of removal from the grave were categorized and their counts analyzed to evaluate the efficiency of the differing excavation methodologies. The methodologies used were the 'pedestal' method, which focuses on the body mass, and the 'stratigraphic' method, in which the grave feature and contents are conjointly excavated. The first grave (Grave A), excavated using the 'pedestal' method, was observed to have a disproportionately larger amount of unassociated bones than did the second (Grave B), which used the 'stratigraphic' method. Chi-square (chi2) goodness-of-fit and contingency tests were performed on the total numbers of recorded elements and different categorical groups of bones, based on size and shape, in each grave. Results demonstrate that significantly greater numbers of unassociated elements resulted from the excavation of Grave A using the pedestal method, both in total number of disarticulated bones as well as within 'large' and 'medium' categories. Conversely 'small' skeletal elements were recovered at a higher rate in Grave B. The lower 'large' and 'medium' bone production rates from Grave B indicate that the stratigraphic method better maintained the provenience and articulation of remains than did Grave A, while the higher 'small' bone recovery rate may point to better recovery techniques of Grave B's excavation team.
机译:万人冢是身体,身体部位,土壤,人工制品和其他特征证据的复杂而混乱的组合。对这些复杂的犯罪现场进行法医调查时,应设法最大程度地收集证据,其中包括凡人遗体,因为它们被放置在坟墓中时处于最佳状态。为了确定更好的方法,研究了两种标准的万人冢挖掘方法。两个经验丰富的团队使用不同的方法,在同一地区开挖了两个单独的但非常可比的万人冢。对从坟墓中移出时与尸体不相关的单个关节骨骼进行分类,并对其计数进行分析,以评估不同挖掘方法的效率。所使用的方法是集中于体重的“基座”方法和“地层”方法,其中联合挖掘了坟墓特征和内容。与使用“地层”方法的第二个坟墓(B坟墓)相比,使用“基座”法挖掘的第一个坟墓(未坟墓)的未结合骨骼的数量要大得多。在每个坟墓中,根据大小和形状,对记录的元素总数和不同类别的骨骼组进行卡方(chi2)拟合优度和应变测试。结果表明,无论是在铰接的骨头总数中,还是在“大”和“中”类别中,使用基架方法挖掘Grave A均会导致大量未结合元素。相反,在坟墓B中,“小”骨骼元素的回收率较高。坟墓B中的“大”骨骼和“中”骨骼生成率较低,这表明地层方法比坟墓A更好地保持了遗骸的出处和清晰度。较高的“小型”骨骼恢复率可能表明Grave B的挖掘团队具有更好的恢复技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号