首页> 外文期刊>Food Policy >Targeting agricultural research and extension for food security and poverty alleviation: a case study of fish farming in Central Cameroon.
【24h】

Targeting agricultural research and extension for food security and poverty alleviation: a case study of fish farming in Central Cameroon.

机译:针对粮食安全和减贫的农业研究和推广:以喀麦隆中部养鱼业为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over 5 years of participatory on-farm research, market access, profitability, farming systems productivity and economic sustainability were compared on 100 small-scale farms in Central Cameroon. Integration technology based on the use of agricultural by-products as fishpond inputs was the driver for intensification. Over all farms, fishpond productivity increased from 498 kg to 1609 kg fish/ha (2145 kg/ha/yr). During the project period, the number of active fish farmers increased from 15 to 192 (including 55 farms which participated only through information exchange). Over all farms, net returns from aquaculture increased by 5 times over pre-project levels. Productivity, intensity and profitability increased more significantly in periurban areas with good market access, compared to rural areas. Among farmers with good market access, average net income from the aquaculture enterprise rose from $118 up to $1485. Research-Extension Team (RET) support cost an average of $61,300 per year. Over 5 years, rural farmers recaptured 23% of the relevant RET investment compared to 442% by periurban farmers. Likewise, increase in production attributable to RET intervention was higher for periurban (253%) compared to rural (11.3%) fish farmers. Within 3 years of the end of extension support, rural farmers had returned to pre-project production levels, whereas periurban farms had better maintained their productivity and profitability. Findings indicate that, in areas with little or no access to markets, the number of fishponds and fish farmers can be increased and yields improved, increasing local food supplies, but sustainability in the absence of extension subsidies is questionable. To achieve either of the two principal goals for the sector, food security and/or poverty alleviation, investments need to be made in improving the availability of quality technical assistance to targeted farmers and finding means of reducing social conflict arising from perceived inequalities in the accrual of the benefits of development.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.07.012
机译:在喀麦隆中部的100个小型农场中,比较了5年的参与性农场研究,市场准入,盈利能力,耕作系统的生产力和经济可持续性。以农业副产品为鱼塘投入为基础的整合技术是集约化的推动力。在所有养殖场中,鱼塘的生产力从498千克/公顷(2145千克/公顷/年)增加到1609千克鱼/公顷。在项目期间,活跃的养鱼户数量从15个增加到192个(包括仅通过信息交流参与的55个养殖场)。在所有农场中,水产养殖的净收益比项目前的水平增加了5倍。与农村地区相比,在具有良好市场准入的郊区地区,生产力,密度和利润率增长更为明显。在市场准入良好的农民中,水产养殖企业的平均净收入从118美元增加到1485美元。研究扩展小组(RET)的支持费用平均每年为$ 61,300。在过去的5年中,农村农民获得了相关可再生能源投资的23%,而郊区农民则为442%。同样,与农村(11.3%)的养鱼户相比,城市郊区(253%)的可归因于RET干预的增产更高。扩展支持终止后的三年内,农村农民已恢复到项目前的生产水平,而郊区农民则更好地保持了生产力和利润率。研究结果表明,在几乎没有市场准入或没有市场准入的地区,可以增加鱼塘和养鱼户的数量,提高产量,增加当地粮食供应,但是在缺乏扩展补贴的情况下可持续性值得怀疑。为了实现该部门的两个主要目标之一,即粮食安全和/或减轻贫困,需要进行投资,以改善向目标农户提供优质技术援助的可能性,并寻找减少因应计收益不平等而引起的社会冲突的手段。开发的好处。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.07.012

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号