...
首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >Can gamma -radiometrics predict soil textural data and stoniness in different parent materials? A comparison of two machine-learning methods.
【24h】

Can gamma -radiometrics predict soil textural data and stoniness in different parent materials? A comparison of two machine-learning methods.

机译:伽玛射线能预测不同母体材料的土壤质地数据和石质吗?两种机器学习方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The use of gamma -radiometrics for soil proximal sensing is strongly site specific, because of the influence of parent material mineralogy on the gamma -rays emitted from the soil. The work wants to propose a non-linear and multivariate computational approach to predict soil textural data and surficial stoniness based on gamma -spectroscopy. The gamma -spectroscopy survey was performed in heterogeneous soils in terms of parent material, pedogenesis, morphology, coarse material and moisture content. The gamma -radiometrics survey was performed by "The Mole" sensor (The Netherlands) and gamma -ray spectra were analysed by a Full Spectrum Analysis. 70 experimental points were described and classified according to parent material and surficial stoniness. The 70 experimental sites were also sampled during the gamma -ray survey and analysed for soil texture and moisture content. An explorative PCA in the experimental points, based on the gamma -ray data and the elevation, showed 3 groups of cases, relating to the three groups of bedrock (i) calcareous flysch, (ii) feldspathic sandstone, and (iii) other lithologies, namely marly-shales, marine and fluvio-lacustrine deposits. Two machine learning models were used to predict sand, clay and surficial stoniness. The models were Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). An independent validation set of 20 soil samples was used to check the accuracy of the prediction models. Both SVM and ANN showed good prediction accuracy for sand and clay, although SVM showed the lowest errors. Both models showed lower accuracy for stoniness prediction, mainly due to high prediction errors in several sampling points. Probably, the high errors in stoniness prediction were due the strong heterogeneity of rock types and mineralogy. However, prediction model of stoniness spatial variability is very important in order to an adequate farming management.
机译:由于母体材料的矿物学对从土壤发出的伽马射线的影响,将伽马射线测量法用于土壤近端感测具有很强的位置特异性。这项工作希望提出一种基于伽玛光谱法的非线性多元计算方法来预测土壤质地数据和表层石质。 γ光谱调查是在非均质土壤中根据母体材料,成岩作用,形态,粗料和水分含量进行的。伽马射线测量学是通过“ The Mole”传感器(荷兰)进行的,伽马射线谱通过全光谱分析进行了分析。描述了70个实验点,并根据母体材料和表面石质进行了分类。在伽马射线调查期间还对70个实验点进行了采样,并分析了土壤质地和水分含量。根据伽马射线数据和高程对实验点进行的探索性PCA显示了三组案例,涉及三组基岩:(i)钙质飞石,(ii)长石砂岩,以及(iii)其他岩性,即泥质页岩,海洋和河流湖相沉积物。使用了两种机器学习模型来预测沙子,粘土和表面石质。这些模型是支持向量机(SVM)和人工神经网络(ANN)。一个由20个土壤样品组成的独立验证集用于检查预测模型的准确性。尽管SVM的误差最低,但SVM和ANN均显示出对砂和粘土的良好预测精度。两种模型都显示出较低的准确性,主要是由于几个采样点的预测误差较高。岩性预测中的高误差可能归因于岩石类型和矿物学的强异质性。然而,对于适当的耕作管理来说,石质空间变异性的预测模型非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号