首页> 中文期刊> 《世界核心医学期刊文摘:妇产科学分册》 >有剖宫产史的产妇选择试产和择期剖宫产两种不同分娩方式母体死亡率和发病率的比较

有剖宫产史的产妇选择试产和择期剖宫产两种不同分娩方式母体死亡率和发病率的比较

         

摘要

Objective This study was undertaken to assess the safety of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Study design Retrospective cohort study of 308,755 Canadian women with previous cesarean delivery between 1988 and 2000. Occurrences of in hospital maternal death, uterine rupture, and other severe maternal morbidity were compared between women with a trial of labor and those with an elective cesarean section. Results Rates of uterine rupture (0.65% ), transfusion (0.19% ), and hysterectomy (0.10% ) were significantly higher in the trial of labor group. Maternal in hospital death rate, however, was lower in the trial of labor group (1.6 per 100,000) than in the elective cesarean section group (5.6 per 100,000). The association between trial of labor and uterine rupture was stronger in low volume (< 500) than in high volume (≥ 500 births per year) obstetric units. Conclusion Trial of labor is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture, but elective cesarean section may increase the risk of maternal death.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号