...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of oncology nursing: the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society >Children's participation in shared decision-making: Children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences
【24h】

Children's participation in shared decision-making: Children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences

机译:儿童参与共同决策:儿童,青少年,父母和医疗保健专业人员的观点和经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose of the research: Despite decision-making featuring throughout the trajectory of cancer care, children's participation in decision-making remains an area much under-researched and complicated by conflicting opinions. This study explored children's participation in shared decision-making (SDM) from multiple perspectives from one haematology/oncology unit in Ireland. Methods and sample: Qualitative research design was used to explore participants' experiences of children's decision-making. Interviews were conducted with children. 11The term 'children' is used to denote both children and adolescents and to avoid cumbersome repetition. aged 7-16 years (n=20), their parents (n=22) and healthcare professionals (n=40). Data were managed with the aid of NVivo (version 8). Key results: Parents and children's roles in decision-making were significantly influenced by the seriousness of the illness. Cancer is a life-threatening illness and so the treatment 'had to be done'. Children were not involved in major decisions (treatment decisions) as refusal was not an option. They were generally involved in minor decisions (choices about care delivery) with the purpose of gaining their cooperation, making treatment more palatable, giving back a sense of control and building trusting relationships. These choices were termed 'small' decisions that would not compromise the child's welfare. Some adolescents were aware that choices were not 'real' decisions since they were not allowed to refuse and expressed feelings of frustration. Conclusions: Healthcare professionals and parents controlled the process of SDM and the children's accounts revealed that they held a minimal role. Children appeared content that adults held responsibility for the major treatment decisions. However, they desired and valued receiving information, voicing their preferences and choosing how treatments were administered to them.
机译:研究目的:尽管决策过程贯穿于癌症治疗的整个过程,但是儿童参与决策的领域仍然研究不足,并且意见分歧。这项研究从爱尔兰的一个血液科/肿瘤科从多个角度探讨了儿童参与共同决策(SDM)的情况。方法和样本:使用定性研究设计来探索参与者对儿童决策的经验。对孩子进行了访谈。 11“儿童”一词用于表示儿童和青少年,并避免繁琐的重复。年龄7-16岁(n = 20),父母(n = 22)和医疗保健专业人员(n = 40)。借助NVivo(版本8)管理数据。关键结果:疾病的严重性极大地影响了父母和孩子在决策中的作用。癌症是威胁生命的疾病,因此必须“进行治疗”。儿童没有参与重大决定(治疗决定),因为拒绝不是一种选择。他们通常参与一些次要的决定(关于提供护理的选择),目的是获得他们的合作,使治疗更可口,给予控制感并建立信任关系。这些选择被称为“小”决定,不会影响孩子的福利。一些青少年意识到选择不是“真正的”决定,因为不允许他们拒绝选择并表达沮丧感。结论:医护人员和父母控制了SDM的过程,孩子们的账目显示他们的作用很小。儿童似乎满足于成年人对主要的治疗决定负责。但是,他们希望并重视接收信息,表达自己的偏好并选择如何对他们进行治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号