首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Safe and effective colon polypectomy in patients receiving uninterrupted anticoagulation: Can we do it?
【24h】

Safe and effective colon polypectomy in patients receiving uninterrupted anticoagulation: Can we do it?

机译:接受不间断抗凝治疗的患者的安全有效的结肠息肉切除术:可以吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the need for colonoscopy screening in the prevention of colon cancer grows, we see more cases of colonos-copy being performed in patients taking anticoagulants. Overall, an increasing number of patients at high risk for bleeding adverse events are undergoing colon polypec-tomy in routine clinical practice. Colon polypectomy has been classified as a high-risk bleeding procedure, with bleeding adverse events seen in more than 196 of cases.1'2 However, the range of adverse events reported is wide (0.696-8.696), likely because of the definition of bleeding, the polypectomy technique, and the clinical setting. A recent, large-scale, multicenter study reported the postpo-lypectomy bleeding rate to be 1.296; however, the issue is that this rate can spike in special circumstances, such as in patients taking anticoagulants.Anticoagulation is a well-known risk factor for postpoly-pectomy bleeding. Several previous studies have reported risk factors for bleeding adverse events after colon polypectomy, including cardiovascular disease, age older than 65 years, hypertension, polyp size larger than 1 cm, and anticoagulation.4'6'9 Anticoagulation in particular increases the risk of procedure-related bleeding 3-fold to 5-fold. Interestingly, even though we are already aware of the issue of bleeding adverse events, and interest has been shown in their management and prevention, previous studies of anticoagulation and postpolypectomy bleeding are very limited. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines for colonoscopy in patients requiring long-term anticoagulation therapy recommend temporary discontinuation of anticoagulants.1 However, although most patients recover from postpolypectomy bleeding, thrombotic adverse events such as stroke from interruption of anticoagulation can be catastrophic. Anticoagulation therapy management, including adjustment of dose, the decision whether to interrupt its administration, and the use of low-moiecular-weight heparin bridging before the procedure, can be complex, and the course chosen can depend on the patient's indication for anticoagulation and comorbid disease status. The logistics of performing randomized studies in this patient population are challenging.
机译:随着结肠镜检查在预防结肠癌中的需要的增长,我们看到在服用抗凝剂的患者中进行结肠镜检查的病例更多。总体而言,在常规临床实践中,越来越多的出血不良事件高风险患者正在接受结肠息肉切除术。结肠息肉切除术已被归类为高风险的出血手术,出血出血的不良事件多于196例。1'2然而,据报道,不良事件的范围很广(0.696-8.696),原因可能是出血,息肉切除术技术和临床环境。最近的一项大规模,多中心研究表明,输卵管切除术后的出血率为1.296;但是,问题在于,在特殊情况下,例如在服用抗凝剂的患者中,该比率可能会飙升。抗凝是众所周知的大肠切除术后出血的危险因素。先前的几项研究报告了结肠息肉切除术后出血不良事件的危险因素,包括心血管疾病,年龄大于65岁的高血压,高血压,息肉大小大于1厘米和抗凝。4'6'9抗凝尤其增加了手术风险相关出血3倍至5倍。有趣的是,即使我们已经意识到出血不良事件的问题,并且已经对其治疗和预防表示出了兴趣,但先前关于抗凝和息肉切除术后出血的研究非常有限。对于需要长期抗凝治疗的患者,美国胃肠道内窥镜学会结肠镜检查指南建议暂时停用抗凝剂。1然而,尽管大多数患者从息肉切除术后出血中恢复过来,但血栓性不良事件(如因抗凝中断而导致的中风)可能具有灾难性。抗凝疗法的管理可能很复杂,包括调整剂量,是否中断其给药的决定以及在手术前使用低分子量肝素桥接,这可能很复杂,选择的疗程取决于患者的抗凝适应症和合并症疾病状况。在该患者人群中进行随机研究的后勤工作具有挑战性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号