...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Uninterrupted warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter: a safe and cost-effective strategy.
【24h】

Uninterrupted warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter: a safe and cost-effective strategy.

机译:不间断的华法林在典型心房扑动的导管消融过程中进行围手术期抗凝:一种安全且具有成本效益的策略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Many patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial flutter (AFL) require periprocedural anticoagulation. We compared a strategy of conversion to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) periprocedure to uninterrupted warfarinization in a nonrandomized, case-controlled study. METHODS: One hundred and one consecutive patients requiring periprocedural anticoagulation for catheter ablation of typical AFL were studied. The first 51 patients underwent conversion to LMWH (enoxaparin 1 mg/kg bd) with a warfarin pause (LMWH group), the subsequent 50 continued with uninterrupted oral anticoagulation (Warfarin group). Primary endpoint was a composite of major and minor bleeding complications and groin symptoms. RESULTS: Fewer patients in the Warfarin group reached the primary endpoint (36.0% vs 56.8%, P = 0.013). Four patients in the LMWH group but no patient in the Warfarin group required hospital admission for bleeding-related complications. Cost analysis showed mean cost per patient of anticoagulation with LMWH to be pounds sterling 100.9 (95% CI 94.46-107.30) compared to pounds sterling 10.23 (4.49-15.97) in the Warfarin group (P < 0.0001). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed prior to ablation in 11 patients in the Warfarin group and in 3 patients in the LMWH (P = 0.019). When TEE costs were included, costs were pounds sterling 125.00 (Dollars 188.25) (96.80-153.60) for the LMWH strategy and pounds sterling 108.5 (Dollars 163.40) (54.92-162.1) for the Warfarin group (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation of typical AFL without interruption of warfarin appears safer and more cost-effective than periprocedural conversion to LMWH. It could be used as a routine anticoagulation strategy for the ablation of right-sided arrhythmias.
机译:简介:许多接受房扑导管消融术的患者需要进行围手术期抗凝治疗。在一项非随机,病例对照研究中,我们比较了从低分子肝素(LMWH)围手术期转化为不间断华法林化的策略。方法:研究了一百零一连续需要进行围手术期抗凝治疗的典型AFL导管消融患者。前51例患者在华法林停药后转为LMWH(依诺肝素1 mg / kg bd)(LMWH组),随后50例继续口服抗凝治疗(Warfarin组)。主要终点是主要和次要出血并发症和腹股沟症状的综合。结果:华法林组达到主要终点的患者较少(36.0%vs 56.8%,P = 0.013)。 LMWH组中有4名患者,但华法林组中无患者因出血相关并发症而需要入院。成本分析显示,与华法林组的每磅10.23英镑(4.49-15.97)相比,每例LMWH抗凝患者的平均成本为英镑100.9(95%CI 94.46-107.30)(P <0.0001)。华法林组11例患者和LMWH组3例患者在消融前进行了食管超声心动图(TEE)检查(P = 0.019)。计入TEE成本后,LMWH策略的成本为125.00英镑(188.25美元)(96.80-153.60),而Warfarin组的成本为108.5英镑(163.40美元)(54.92-162.1)(P <0.0001)。结论:在不中断华法林的情况下,典型的AFL导管消融术比向LMWH的围手术期转换更安全,更具成本效益。它可以用作消融右侧心律不齐的常规抗凝策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号