...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: Official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery >Surgical treatment of left main disease and severe carotid stenosis: Does the off-pump technique provide a better outcome?
【24h】

Surgical treatment of left main disease and severe carotid stenosis: Does the off-pump technique provide a better outcome?

机译:左主干疾病和严重颈动脉狭窄的手术治疗:非体外循环技术能否提供更好的结果?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Left main disease (LMD), combined with carotid artery stenosis (CAS), constitutes a high-risk patient population. Priority is often given to coronary revascularization, due to the severity of the angina. However, the choice of revascularization strategy [off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) vs coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] remains elusive. Methods: A total of 1340 patients with LMD were non-randomly assigned to either on-pump (CABG group, n = 680) or off-pump (OPCAB group, n = 634) revascularization between 1 January 2006 and 21 September 2010. Multivariable regression was used to determine the risk-adjusted impact of a revascularization strategy on a composite in-hospital outcome (MACCE), and proportional hazards regression was used to define the variables affecting long-term survival. Results: Significant CAS was found in 130 patients: 84 (13.1%) patients underwent OPCAB, while 46 patients (6.8%) underwent CABG (P < 0.05). Patients with a history of stroke/transient ischaemic attack were also more likely to receive OPCAB (7.1 vs 4.7%; P = 0.08). OPCAB patients were older, in a higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, with a lower LVEF and higher EuroSCORE. A calcified aorta was found in 79 patients [OPCAB-CABG: 49 (7.73%) vs 30 (4.41%); P = 0.016] and resulted in a less complex revascularization (OPCAB-CABG: 2.3 ?? 0.71 vs 3.19 ?? 0.82; P < 0.05), and 30-day mortality was insignificantly higher in the CABG (2.7 vs 2.8%) as well as MACCE (11.2 vs 12.2%; P = NS). This trend reversed when late mortality was evaluated; however, it did not reach significance at 60 months. Preoperative renal impairment requiring dialysis was found to be a technique-independent predictor of MACCE. The number of arterial conduits also influenced MACCE. Conclusions: Off-pump coronary revascularization may offer risk reduction of neurological complications in patients with a significant carotid artery disease and a history of previous stroke, but a larger study population is needed to support this thesis. The growing discrepancy in long-term survival should draw attention to a more complete revascularization in OPCAB patients. ? The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
机译:目的:左主干疾病(LMD)合并颈动脉狭窄(CAS)构成高危患者人群。由于心绞痛的严重性,通常优先考虑冠脉血运重建。然而,血运重建策略的选择[非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)与冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)]仍然难以捉摸。方法:在2006年1月1日至2010年9月21日期间,共1340例LMD患者被随机分配到泵上(CABG组,n = 680)或泵外(OPCAB组,n = 634)血运重建。回归分析用于确定血运重建策略对综合住院结局(MACCE)的风险调整影响,而比例风险回归则用于定义影响长期生存的变量。结果:在130例患者中发现了明显的CAS:84例(13.1%)进行了OPCAB,而46例(6.8%)进行了CABG(P <0.05)。有中风/短暂性脑缺血发作病史的患者也更有可能接受OPCAB(7.1 vs 4.7%; P = 0.08)。 OPCAB患者年龄较大,纽约心脏协会(NYHA)级别较高,LVEF较低,EuroSCORE较高。在79例患者中发现了钙化的主动脉[OPCAB-CABG:49(7.73%)对30(4.41%); P = 0.016],并导致血运重建的复杂性降低(OPCAB-CABG:2.3≤0.71 vs 3.19≤0.82; P <0.05),CABG的30天死亡率也微不足道(2.7相对2.8%)。 MACCE(11.2 vs 12.2%; P = NS)。当评估晚期死亡率时,这种趋势发生了逆转。但是,它在60个月时没有达到显着水平。发现需要透析的术前肾脏损害是MACCE的技术独立指标。动脉导管的数量也影响了MACCE。结论:非体外循环冠脉血运重建术可以降低患有严重颈动脉疾病和既往有中风病史的患者神经系统并发症的风险,但需要大量的研究人群来支持这一观点。长期生存中越来越大的差异应引起人们对OPCAB患者更完全血运重建的关注。 ?作者2012。由牛津大学出版社代表欧洲心胸外科协会出版。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号