首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Radiology >The value of strain ratio in differential diagnosis of thyroid solid nodules
【24h】

The value of strain ratio in differential diagnosis of thyroid solid nodules

机译:应变比在甲状腺实性结节鉴别诊断中的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To assess the clinical value of strain ratio in differentiating thyroid solid nodules and explore its distribution characters based on pathological results. Materials and methods: The study was approved by the ethic committee and the informed consents were signed. Ninety nine solid thyroid nodules (67 benign and 32 malignant) from 71 female (mean age 46.3 ± 9.8 years) and 28 male (mean age 54.9 ± 11.7 years) patients were evaluated. Five radiologists evaluated the nodules based on a four-degree elastography score system. Strain ratio was calculated on-line. Diagnostic performances of the two evaluations were compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Values of different pathological nodules were compared by one-way ANOVA. Results: Areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of the five readers were 0.82, 0.81, 0.79, 0.73 and 0.83, respectively. The AUC of strain ratio evaluation was higher (0.88 vs. 0.79, p < 0.001) than that of the ES score evaluation. Best cut-off points of the two evaluations were 3.5 (82% sensitivity, 72% specificity) and 4.225 (81% sensitivity, 83% specificity), respectively. Both the ES score and strain ratio were higher for malignant nodules than that for benign ones (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Strain ratio was a useful index in differential diagnosis of thyroid solid nodules. It can provide quantitative information on thyroid nodule characterization and improve diagnostic confidence. The best cut-off point for benign and malignant nodules was 4.2.
机译:目的:评估应变比在鉴别甲状腺实性结节中的临床价值,并根据病理结果探讨其分布特征。材料和方法:该研究已获得伦理委员会的批准,并签署知情同意书。评估了71位女性(平均年龄46.3±9.8岁)和28位男性(平均年龄54.9±11.7岁)患者的99例甲状腺实性结节(67例良性和32例恶性)。五位放射科医生根据四度弹性成像评分系统评估了结节。在线计算应变比。使用接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线比较了两次评估的诊断性能。通过单因素方差分析比较不同病理结节的值。结果:五个阅读器的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.82、0.81、0.79、0.73和0.83。应变比评估的AUC高于ES评分评估的AUC(0.88对0.79,p <0.001)。两次评估的最佳分界点分别为3.5(敏感性82%,特异性72%)和4.225(敏感性81%,特异性83%)。恶性结节的ES评分和应变率均高于良性结节(p <0.001)。结论:应变比是鉴别甲状腺实性结节的有用指标。它可以提供有关甲状腺结节特征的定量信息,并提高诊断信心。良性和恶性结节的最佳分界点是4.2。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号