...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of gastroenterology and hepatology >Radiofrequency ablation plus chemoembolization versus radiofrequency ablation alone for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
【24h】

Radiofrequency ablation plus chemoembolization versus radiofrequency ablation alone for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

机译:射频消融加化学栓塞与单纯射频消融治疗肝细胞癌:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is a continuing debate on whether transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is more effective than RFA alone in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We carried out this meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials to provide greater clarity on whether RFA plus TACE was more effective than RFA alone for HCC. METHODS: A literature search was carried out for all possible randomized-controlled trials. The outcomes were overall survival rates and major complications. Data were abstracted using standardized forms, and an overall rating of the quality of evidence was assigned using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria. We estimated summary odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to assess the effects. RESULTS: Seven randomized-controlled trials were included. Meta-analysis showed that RFA plus TACE significantly improved the survival rates of patients with HCC at 1 and 3 years (for the one-survival rate, fixed-effects OR=2.71, 95% CI 1.65-4.43, P<0.0001; for the three-survival rate, fixed-effects OR=2.27, 95% CI 1.57-3.27, P<0.0001) compared with RFA alone. There was no difference in terms of major complications (fixed-effects OR=1.26, 95% CI 0.33-4.77, P=0.73). Subgroup analyses by tumor size showed that RFA plus TACE significantly improved the survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years compared with RFA alone in patients with HCC larger than 3 cm; however, there was no advantage of TACE plus RFA over RFA alone for patients with HCC smaller than 3 cm. The quality of evidence was high for the 1-year survival rate, the 3-year survival rate, and major complications. No evidence of publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: High-quality evidence suggests that TACE plus RFA improve the survival rates compared with RFA alone for patients with HCC larger than 3 cm.
机译:背景:对于肝癌(HCC)患者,经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)加射频消融(RFA)是否比单独使用RFA更有效。我们对随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,以更清晰地了解RFA加TACE是否比单独的RFA更有效。方法:对所有可能的随机对照试验进行文献检索。结果是总体生存率和主要并发症。使用标准化形式提取数据,并使用GRADE(建议等级,评估,制定和评估)标准对证据质量进行总体评分。我们用其95%的置信区间(95%CI)估算了总优势比(OR),以评估效果。结果:包括七项随机对照试验。荟萃分析显示,RFA加TACE可以显着提高1年和3年HCC患者的生存率(单生存率,固定效应OR = 2.71,95%CI 1.65-4.43,P <0.0001;三生存率,固定效应OR = 2.27,95%CI为1.57-3.27,P <0.0001)。在主要并发症方面没有差异(固定效应OR = 1.26,95%CI 0.33-4.77,P = 0.73)。按肿瘤大小进行的亚组分析显示,与单独使用RFA相比,RFA加TACE显着提高了HCC大于3 cm的患者的1、3和5年生存率。但是,对于肝癌小于3 cm的患者,TACE加RFA比单纯RFA没有优势。 1年生存率,3年生存率和重大并发症的证据质量很高。没有观察到发表偏见的证据。结论:高质量的证据表明,与单独使用RFA相比,TACE加RFA可以提高HCC大于3 cm患者的生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号