首页> 外文期刊>Korean journal of radiology : >Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinomas Compared with Radiofrequency Ablation Alone: A Time-to-Event Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinomas Compared with Radiofrequency Ablation Alone: A Time-to-Event Meta-Analysis

机译:射频消融联合经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝癌与单独射频消融的疗效和安全性:事件发生时间的荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with RFA alone for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). Materials and Methods Randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies that compared the clinical or oncologic outcomes of combination therapy of TACE and RFA versus RFA for the treatment of HCC were identified through literature searches of electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Google Scholar). Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were combined as the effective value to assess the summary effects. The strength of evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Results Six RCTs with 534 patients were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that the combination of TACE and RFA is associated with a significantly longer overall survival (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.49-0.78, p Conclusion In patients with HCC, the combination of TACE and RFA is associated with significantly higher overall survival and recurrence-free survival, as compared with RFA monotherapy, without significant difference in major complications.
机译:目的比较射频消融(RFA)和经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)与单独RFA联合治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的有效性和安全性。材料和方法通过电子数据库的文献检索,确定了比较TACE和RFA联合治疗与RFA联合治疗HCC的临床或肿瘤学结果的随机对照试验(RCT)研究(Pubmed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,中国生物医学杂志)光盘,中国国家知识基础设施和Google学术搜索)。将危险比(HR)或优势比(OR)及其相应的95%置信区间(CI)组合为有效值,以评估汇总效果。证据的强度由“建议评估,制定和评估”系统分级。结果纳入了534例患者的6项随机对照试验纳入了荟萃分析。荟萃分析显示,TACE和RFA的组合与更长的总生存期相关(HR = 0.62,95%CI:0.49-0.78,p结论)在HCC患者中,TACE和RFA的组合与显着更长的生存期相关与RFA单一疗法相比,总体生存率和无复发生存率更高,主要并发症无明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号