首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >ECG-guided central venous catheter positioning: does it detect the pericardial reflection rather than the right atrium?
【24h】

ECG-guided central venous catheter positioning: does it detect the pericardial reflection rather than the right atrium?

机译:ECG引导的中心静脉导管定位:它是否检测到心包反射而不是右心房?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although electrocardiography (ECG) guidance of central venous catheters (CVCs) is traditionally thought to detect the entrance into the right atrium (RA), there is little evidence in the literature to confirm this. We previously observed a high incidence of left-sided CVCs abutting the wall of the superior vena cava (SVC), even when the catheters were advanced past the point of increased P-wave amplitude. Our hypothesis was that this ECG amplitude signal is actually detecting the pericardial reflection rather than the RA. The goal of the study was to position catheter tips under ECG guidance outside the RA. METHODS: One-hundred central venous triple-lumen catheters inserted either via the right or the left internal jugular veins, respectively, were analysed in cardiac surgical patients. The position of the catheter tip was ascertained by ECG. METHOD A: A Seldinger guide-wire in the distal lumen served as exploring electrode, the respective insertion depth was recorded. METHOD B: The middle lumen (port opening 2.5 cm from the catheter tip, thus the catheter was advanced more towards the atrium) filled with a saline 10% fluid column served as the exploring electrode, and the insertion depth was recorded again. Descriptive data are given as mean+/-standard deviation. RESULTS: On average, the catheters were advanced by the expected 2+/-0.3 cm using Method B beyond the initial insertion by Method A. All 100 CVCs were finally correctly positioned in the SVC and confirmed by transoesophageal echocardiography. When chest radiography was performed after surgery not a single catheter abutted the lateral wall of the SVC. CONCLUSION: Since both methods detected the same structure, and catheters placed by Method B did not result in intra-atrial CVC tip position, the first increase in P-wave amplitude does correspond to a structure in the SVC, most likely the pericardial reflection.
机译:背景与目的:尽管传统上认为中央静脉导管(CVC)的心电图(ECG)引导可检测右心房(RA)的入口,但文献中很少有证据可以证实这一点。我们先前观察到,即使导管前进经过增加的P波振幅点,左侧CVC仍紧靠上腔静脉(SVC)壁的发生率很高。我们的假设是,此ECG振幅信号实际上是在检测心包反射,而不是RA。该研究的目的是将导管尖端置于ECG引导下的RA外部。方法:分析了在心脏外科手术患者中分别通过右或左颈内静脉插入的一百个中央静脉三腔导管。导管尖端的位置通过ECG确定。方法A:远端管腔中的Seldinger导丝用作探查电极,记录各自的插入深度。方法B:填充有10%生理盐水柱作为探查电极的中腔(距导管尖端2.5厘米的端口开口,因此导管向心房前进的方向更多),并再次记录插入深度。描述性数据以平均值+/-标准偏差给出。结果:平均而言,使用方法B将导管推进预期的2 +/- 0.3厘米,超出通过方法A进行的初始插入。最后将所有100个CVC正确放置在SVC中,并通过经食道超声心动图确认。手术后进行胸部X光检查时,没有一个导管邻接SVC的侧壁。结论:由于两种方法都检测到相同的结构,并且用方法B放置的导管未导致房内CVC尖端位置,因此P波振幅的首次增加确实对应于SVC中的结构,最可能是心包反射。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号