首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Government policy in the formal and informal sectors
【24h】

Government policy in the formal and informal sectors

机译:正式和非正式部门的政府政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper quantitatively investigates, in general equilibrium, the interaction between the firms' choice to operate in the formal or the informal sector and government policy on taxation and enforcement, given a level of regulation. A static version of Ghironi and Melitz's (2005) industry model is used to show that firms with lower productivity endogenously choose to operate in the informal sector. I use cross-country data on taxes, measures of informality, and measures of regulation (entry and compliance costs, red tape, etc.) to back out how high the enforcement levels must be country by country to make the theory match the data. The welfare gains from policy reforms are on average 1.2% (measured in terms of consumption) for OECD countries. I alsofind that the welfare gains from reducing regulation are on average 2.1%. Finally, performing a similar decomposition to that of Hall and Jones (1999), I find that distortions associated with informality account for a factor of 1.5 of the output per capita difference between the richest and the poorest countries.
机译:本文在总体均衡的情况下,定量研究了在一定监管水平下企业在正规或非正规部门中的经营选择与政府的税收和执法政策之间的相互作用。 Ghironi和Melitz(2005)的行业模型的静态版本用于显示生产率较低的公司内生地选择在非正规部门经营。我使用有关税收,非正式措施和规章措施(入境和合规成本,繁文tape节等)的跨国数据来证明各国必须将执法水平提高到多少才能使理论与数据相匹配。经济合作与发展组织国家从政策改革中获得的福利收益平均为1.2%(按消费衡量)。我还发现,减少监管带来的福利收益平均为2.1%。最后,与霍尔和琼斯(Hall and Jones,1999)进行类似的分解,我发现与非正规性相关的扭曲占最富国与最穷国家人均产出差异的1.5倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号