...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental health perspectives. >Effectiveness of an integrated pest management intervention in controlling cockroaches, mice, and allergens in New York City public housing.
【24h】

Effectiveness of an integrated pest management intervention in controlling cockroaches, mice, and allergens in New York City public housing.

机译:综合害虫管理干预措施对控制纽约市公共住房中的蟑螂,小鼠和过敏原的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Cockroaches and mice, which are common in urban homes, are sources of allergens capable of triggering asthma symptoms. Traditional pest control involves the use of scheduled applications of pesticides by professionals as well as pesticide use by residents. In contrast, integrated pest management (IPM) involves sanitation, building maintenance, and limited use of least toxic pesticides. OBJECTIVES: We implemented and evaluated IPM compared with traditional practice for its impact on pests, allergens, pesticide use, and resident satisfaction in a large urban public housing authority. METHODS: We assigned IPM or control status to 13 buildings in five housing developments, and evaluated conditions at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months in 280 apartments in Brooklyn and Manhattan, in New York City (New York). We measured cockroach and mouse populations, collected cockroach and mouse urinary protein allergens in dust, and interviewed residents. All statistical models controlled for baseline levels of pests or allergens. RESULTS: Compared with controls, apartments receiving IPM had significantly lower counts of cockroaches at 3 months and greater success in reducing or sustaining low counts of cockroaches at both 3 and 6 months. IPM was associated with lower cockroach allergen levels in kitchens at 3 months and in beds and kitchens at 6 months. Pesticide use was reduced in IPM relative to control apartments. Residents of IPM apartments also rated building services more positively. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous IPM studies, which involved extensive cleaning, repeat visits, and often extensive resident education, we found that an easily replicable single IPM visit was more effective than the regular application of pesticides alone in managing pests and their consequences.
机译:背景:在城市家庭中常见的蟑螂和小鼠是能够引发哮喘症状的过敏原的来源。传统的虫害控制涉及专业人员对农药的预定使用以及居民对农药的使用。相反,病虫害综合治理(IPM)涉及环境卫生,建筑物维护以及对毒性最小的农药的有限使用。目标:我们对IPM进行了评估,并与传统实践进行了比较,以评估其对害虫,过敏原,农药使用和大型城市公共住房机构中居民满意度的影响。方法:我们将IPM或控制状态分配给五个住房开发中的13座建筑物,并分别评估了位于纽约市(布鲁克林)和布鲁克林和曼哈顿的280套公寓的基准线,3个月和6个月的状况。我们测量了蟑螂和老鼠的种群,收集了灰尘中的蟑螂和老鼠尿蛋白过敏原,并采访了居民。所有统计模型均控制有害生物或过敏原的基线水平。结果:与对照组相比,接受IPM的公寓在3个月时的蟑螂数量明显减少,在3个月和6个月时减少或维持低数量蟑螂的成功率更高。 IPM与3个月的厨房以及6个月的床和厨房的蟑螂过敏原水平较低相关。与对照公寓相比,IPM中的农药使用减少了。 IPM公寓的居民对建筑服务的评价也更高。结论:与以往的IPM研究不同,IPM研究涉及广泛的清洁,重复访问以及经常的居民教育,我们发现,一次易于复制的IPM访问比单独施用农药更有效地控制害虫及其后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号