首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Reviews >Leaching of nitrate from temperate forests — effects of air pollution and forest management
【24h】

Leaching of nitrate from temperate forests — effects of air pollution and forest management

机译:温带森林中硝酸盐的淋溶—空气污染和森林管理的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

We compiled regional and continental data on inoiganic nitrogen (N) in seepage and surface water from temperate forests. Currently, N concentrations in forest waters are usually well below water quality standards. But elevated concentrations are frequently found in regions with chronic N input from deposition (>8-10 kg ha~(-1) a~(-1)). We synthesized the current understanding of factors controlling N leaching in relation to three primary causes of N cycle disruption: (i) Increased N input (air pollution, fertilization, N_2 fixing plants). In European forests, elevated N deposition explains approximately half of the variability in N leaching, some of the remaining variability could be explained by differences in N availability or "N status". For coniferous forests, needle N content above 1.4% and (or) forest floor C:N ratio lower than 25 were thresholds for elevated nitrate leaching. At adjacent sites conifer forests receive higher N deposition and exhibit higher nitrate loss than deciduous forests;an exception is alder that shows substantial nitrate leaching through N fixation input. Fertilization with N poses limited risk to water quality, when applied to N-limited forests. (ii) Reduced plant uptake (clear-cut, thinning, weed control). The N cycle responses to plant cover disturbance by clear-cut are well studied. Nitrate losses peak after 2-3 years and are back to pre-cut levels after 3-5 years. Nitrogen losses increase with deposition and are higher at N rich sites. The extent and duration ofthe nitrate response is especially connected to the recovery of the vegetation sink. Less intensive disturbances like thinning have only minor effects on N loss. (iii) Enhanced mineralization of soil N (liming, ditching, climate change) Responses in nitrate leaching after liming may increase with N deposition and in older stands. However data on these types of N cycle disruption are too sparse to allow general conclusions on controlling factors. Nitrate leaching occurs when N deposition (input) and netmineralization (N status) exceed plant demand. A combined N flux to the soil of 50 to 60 kg ha~(-1) a~(-1) from N deposition and litterfall may be a threshold for nitrate leaching in undisturbed forests. This threshold also indicates risk of increasinglosses in case of a disturbance (e.g., clear-cut). We conclude by discussing forest management options for water quality protection. These options focus on decreasing input, increasing plant uptake, increasing biomass removal, and (re)establishing immobilization and denitrification processes at the catchment scale.
机译:我们汇总了温带森林渗流和地表水中烟碱氮(N)的区域和大陆数据。当前,森林水中的氮浓度通常远低于水质标准。但是在沉积引起的长期氮输入区域(> 8-10 kg ha〜(-1)a〜(-1))中经常发现浓度升高。我们综合了与N循环中断的三个主要原因有关的控制N浸出的因素的当前理解:(i)增加的N输入(空气污染,施肥,N_2固定植物)。在欧洲森林中,氮沉降的增加解释了氮淋失的大约一半的可变性,一些剩余的可变性可以通过氮有效性或“ N状态”的差异来解释。对于针叶林,针叶氮含量高于1.4%和(或)林地碳氮比低于25是硝酸盐淋溶升高的阈值。在针叶林中,针叶林比落叶林具有更高的氮沉降和更高的硝酸盐损失; al木除外,后者通过固氮输入而大量浸出硝酸盐。当施用于氮有限的森林时,施氮对水质构成的风险有限。 (ii)减少植物吸收(明确,间伐,杂草控制)。清楚研究了N循环对植物覆盖扰动的响应。硝酸盐损失在2-3年后达到峰值,并在3-5年后恢复到预先削减的水平。氮的损失随着沉积的增加而增加,在氮富集的地方氮损失更高。硝酸盐反应的程度和持续时间尤其与植被汇的恢复有关。强度较低的干扰(如间伐)仅对氮损失产生较小的影响。 (iii)增加土壤N的矿化作用(石灰,沟渠,气候变化)石灰后硝酸盐浸出的响应可能会随着N的沉积和陈年期的增加而增加。但是,关于这些类型的N循环破坏的数据太稀疏,无法得出有关控制因素的一般性结论。当氮沉降(输入)和净矿化(氮状态)超过工厂需求时,就会发生硝酸盐浸出。由氮的沉积和凋落物引起的土壤总氮通量为50至60 kg ha〜(-1)a〜(-1)可能是未受干扰的森林中硝酸盐淋失的阈值。该阈值还指示在发生干扰(例如,清晰)的情况下增加损失的风险。最后,我们讨论了保护水质的森林管理方案。这些选择集中在减少投入,增加植物吸收,增加生物量去除以及(重新)建立集水规模的固定化和反硝化过程上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号