首页> 外文期刊>Ecology of Food and Nutrition >An historical review of the Harvard and the National Cancer Institute Food Frequency Questionnaires: Their similarities, differences, and their limitations in assessment of food intake
【24h】

An historical review of the Harvard and the National Cancer Institute Food Frequency Questionnaires: Their similarities, differences, and their limitations in assessment of food intake

机译:哈佛大学和美国国家癌症研究所食物频率问卷的历史回顾:它们在食物摄入量评估中的异同和局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQ) are pre-coded forms consisting of selected foods that are usually grouped based on their nutrient constitution. By carefully selecting food items that are most important to the basic diet and by grouping them, a relatively short questionnaire can be developed to estimate nutritional exposure accurately, at a relatively low cost. Two major FFQs, the Harvard University/Willett's Questionnaire and the National Cancer Institute/Block's Questionnaire as well as their modified versions have been used in different studies. In general the contents of two FFQs are similar. However, nuances in structure and cognitive aspects set them apart. The objectives of this paper are three fold. First, to provide a historical review of the process of design and development of each FFQ. Second, to compare their cognitive and structural similarities and differences, and finally, to discuss their limitations and biases associated with estimating food intake. [References: 98]
机译:食物频率问卷(FFQ)是预先编码的形式,由通常根据其营养成分进行分组的选定食物组成。通过仔细选择对基本饮食最重要的食物并将其分组,可以开发出一个相对较短的问卷,以相对较低的成本准确地估算营养摄入量。在两个研究中使用了两个主要的FFQ,分别是哈佛大学/威利特问卷和美国国家癌症研究所/布洛克问卷。通常,两个FFQ的内容是相似的。但是,结构和认知方面的细微差别将它们区分开。本文的目标是三个方面。首先,对每个FFQ的设计和开发过程进行历史回顾。其次,比较它们在认知和结构上的异同,最后讨论与估计食物摄入量相关的局限性和偏见。 [参考:98]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号