首页> 外文期刊>Biochemistry and molecular biology education >Commentary: Argument in Life Science Education
【24h】

Commentary: Argument in Life Science Education

机译:评论:生命科学教育之争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As a biologist, it is sometimes distressing to hear the lay press misuse the term "theory" in reference to Evolution, as though somehow that word weakens its universal acceptance among the scientific community. It is just as unnerving to hear the misuse of "argument" between scientists as reason to doubt the basic value or premise of major areas of scientific agreement. Nonetheless, we need to look carefully at education in science in general and the life sciences in particular as to why we don't incorporate "argument" as a basic component of how we teach the molecular life sciences. After all, argument, debate, critique, disagreements, and rebuttal are all essential components of how we proceed in science. But their role in the classroom have been limited and confined to subsets of graduate education.
机译:作为一名生物学家,有时听到令人沮丧的新闻报道误用“理论”一词来指代进化论,似乎这个词在某种程度上削弱了它在科学界的普遍接受度。听到科学家之间滥用“论据”和怀疑科学共识主要领域的基本价值或前提的理由一样令人不安。尽管如此,我们仍需要仔细研究一般的科学教育,尤其是生命科学,以了解为什么我们不将“论证”作为我们教授分子生命科学的基本组成部分。毕竟,论点,辩论,评论,分歧和反驳都是我们科学发展方式的基本组成部分。但是它们在课堂上的作用受到限制,并且仅限于研究生教育的子集。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号