...
首页> 外文期刊>Biochemistry and molecular biology education >Commentary: Argument in Life Science Education
【24h】

Commentary: Argument in Life Science Education

机译:评论:生命科学教育的论证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As a biologist, it is sometimes distressing to hear the lay press misuse the term "theory" in reference to Evolution, as though somehow that word weakens its universal acceptance among the scientific community. It is just as unnerving to hear the misuse of "argument" between scientists as reason to doubt the basic value or premise of major areas of scientific agreement. Nonetheless, we need to look carefully at education in science in general and the life sciences in particular as to why we don't incorporate "argument" as a basic component of how we teach the molecular life sciences. After all, argument, debate, critique, disagreements, and rebuttal are all essential components of how we proceed in science. But their role in the classroom have been limited and confined to subsets of graduate education.
机译:作为一个生物学家,听到躺着的误导术语“理论”参考演变有时会令人痛苦地令人痛苦地令人痛苦,因为某种方式削弱了科学界之间的普遍接受。 听到科学家之间的“论证”是令人讨厌的,因为怀疑科学协议的主要领域的基本价值或前提是理性。 尽管如此,我们需要仔细看待科学教育,以及为什么我们不将“论证”作为我们如何教导分子生命科学的基本组成部分。 毕竟,争论,辩论,批判,分歧和反驳是我们在科学中如何进行的所有重要组成部分。 但他们在课堂上的作用受到限制,局限于研究生教育的子集。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号