...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of law and psychiatry >Antisocial features and 'faking bad': A critical note
【24h】

Antisocial features and 'faking bad': A critical note

机译:反社会特征和“假冒伪劣”:重要说明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We critically review the literature on antisocial personality features and symptom fabrication (i.e., faking bad; e.g., malingering). A widespread assumption is that these constructs are intimately related. Some studies have, indeed, found that antisocial individuals score higher on instruments detecting faking bad, but others have been unable to replicate this pattern. In addition, studies exploring whether antisocial individuals are especially talented in faking bad have generally come up with null results. The notion of an intrinsic link between antisocial features and faking bad is difficult to test and research in this domain is sensitive to selection bias. We argue that research on faking bad would profit from further theoretical articulation. One topic that deserves scrutiny is how antisocial features affect the cognitive dissonance typically induced by faking bad. We illustrate our points with preliminary data and discuss their implications. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:我们会严格审查有关反社会人格特征和症状捏造的文献(即冒充坏品;例如作弊)。一个普遍的假设是这些结构是紧密相关的。确实,一些研究发现,反社会个人在检测伪造品不良的工具上得分更高,但是其他人无法复制这种模式。此外,探索反社会个体是否在伪劣方面特别有才干的研究通常得出无效的结果。反社会特征与假冒伪劣之间存在内在联系的概念很难检验,并且在这一领域的研究对选择偏见很敏感。我们认为,关于假冒伪劣的研究将从进一步的理论阐述中受益。一个值得仔细研究的话题是反社会特征如何影响通常由伪劣造成的认知失调。我们用初步数据说明了我们的观点,并讨论了它们的含义。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利