首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Intelligent Defence Support Systems >Online vs. written multiple-choice questions tests: accuracy and usefulness
【24h】

Online vs. written multiple-choice questions tests: accuracy and usefulness

机译:在线选择题与书面选择题测试:准确性和实用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

With the online resources becoming common, one can ask what the limitations are when applied to online examinations. Standardised multiple-choice questions (MCQs) test are commonly used either as a tool to enable student self-examination or as a tool to test large number of students in a more efficient way. However, the means of delivery and what one intends the tests to measure should be carefully considered. During last two years in teaching, the course 'Signals and Systems', both online and written, proctored and non-proctored, MCQs test were used in production environment (in vivo). Obtained data suggest that test delivery method strongly influences test accuracy when measuring the knowledge students gained. Online non-proctored delivery, although being the simplest, yields strongly biased results and is suitable only as a tool to enable student self-assessment of the gained knowledge, while the online or written (non-strictly) proctored tests are still the method of choice if one wants to objectively measure the knowledge gained by students.
机译:随着在线资源变得越来越普遍,人们可以问到应用于在线考试的局限性是什么。标准化的多项选择题(MCQs)测试通常用作使学生能够进行自我检查的工具,也可以作为以更有效的方式测试大量学生的工具。但是,应仔细考虑交付方式和打算测量的内容。在过去两年的教学中,在线和书面,监禁和非监禁MCQs测试“信号和系统”课程都用于生产环境(体内)。所获得的数据表明,在评估学生获得的知识时,考试交付方法会严重影响考试准确性。在线非监督式交付虽然最简单,但产生的结果有很大偏差,仅适合作为一种工具,使学生能够对所获得的知识进行自我评估,而在线或书面(非严格)监督式测试仍然是一种方法。选择是否要客观地衡量学生获得的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号