...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical oncology >Out-of-pocket payment and cost-effectiveness of XELOX and XELOX plus bevacizumab therapy: from the perspective of metastatic colorectal cancer patients in Japan.
【24h】

Out-of-pocket payment and cost-effectiveness of XELOX and XELOX plus bevacizumab therapy: from the perspective of metastatic colorectal cancer patients in Japan.

机译:XELOX和XELOX加贝伐单抗疗法的自付费用和成本效益:从日本转移性结直肠癌患者的角度来看。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to estimate the out-of-pocket payment and cost-effectiveness of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) or XELOX plus bevacizumab from the perspective of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). METHODS: Based on the NO16966 and NO16967 trials, the mean out-of-pocket payment was calculated from patient-level data. Out-of-pocket payments for 16 cycles (11 months) of first-line chemotherapy and 8 cycles (5 months) of second-line chemotherapy were included. In addition, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for first-line bevacizumab were calculated by dividing the difference of the out-of-pocket payment by the difference of the mean number of progression-free survival (PFS) years or quality-adjusted PFS (QAPFS) years. RESULTS: The mean out-of-pocket payments for middle-income patients under 70 years of age were JPY 328,000 for 16 cycles of first-line XELOX and JPY 376,000 for XELOX plus bevacizumab. The mean out-of-pocket payment for 8 cycles of second-line XELOX was calculated to be JPY 175,000. Middle-income patients over 70 years of age were required to pay JPY 61,000 and JPY 72,000 for first-line XELOX and XELOX plus bevacizumab, respectively. The ICERs of middle-income patients <70 years of age were JPY 430,000/PFS-year and JPY 720,000/QAPFS-year, and those of middle-income patients >70 years of age were JPY 100,000/PFS-year and JPY 170,000/QAPFS-year. CONCLUSIONS: We clarified the out-of-pocket payment and cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy of MCRC patients in Japan. Our previous survey shows it is highly possible that many patients prefer to pay that incremental out-of-pocket payment to gain one additional QAPFS year. However, our cost-effectiveness analysis was not conducted from the perspective of society or healthcare payers.
机译:目的:我们的研究目的是从转移性结直肠癌(MCRC)患者的角度评估卡培他滨加奥沙利铂(XELOX)或XELOX加贝伐单抗的自付费用和成本效益。方法:根据NO16966和NO16967试验,从患者水平数据计算出平均自付费用。包括一线化疗16个周期(11个月)和二线化疗8个周期(5个月)的自付费用。此外,通过将自付费用的差额除以无进展生存期(PFS)年的平均数或经过质量调整的差额,来计算一线贝伐单抗的增量成本效益比(ICER) PFS(QAPFS)年。结果:70岁以下的中等收入患者的平均自付费用为一线XELOX的16个周期为328,000日元,XELOX加贝伐单抗的为376,000日元。 8个周期的第二线XELOX的平均自付费用为175,000日元。 70岁以上的中等收入患者需要分别为一线XELOX和XELOX加贝伐单抗支付61,000日元和72,000日元。 <70岁以下的中等收入患者的ICER为430,000日元/ PFS年和720,000日元/ QAPFS年,> 70岁以上的中等收入患者的ICER为100,000 / PFS年和170,000日元/ QAPFS年。结论:我们阐明了日本MCRC患者的自付费用和化疗的成本效益。我们之前的调查显示,很可能许多患者更愿意支付这种自付费用,以增加一年的QAPFS。但是,我们并非从社会或医疗保健支付者的角度进行成本效益分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号