首页> 外文期刊>International clinical psychopharmacology >Number needed to treat and time to response/remission for quetiapine monotherapy efficacy in acute bipolar depression: evidence from a large, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
【24h】

Number needed to treat and time to response/remission for quetiapine monotherapy efficacy in acute bipolar depression: evidence from a large, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

机译:喹硫平单药治疗急性双相抑郁症所需的治疗次数和响应/缓解时间:来自一项大型,随机,安慰剂对照研究的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The objectives of this analysis are to elucidate the clinical significance of antidepressant effects with quetiapine by evaluating number needed to treat as well as time to response and remission with quetiapine monotherapy in patients with acute bipolar depression. A post-hoc analysis was conducted of 542 patients with bipolar I or II disorder, (moderate to severe depression), randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with quetiapine 600 mg/day (n=180), quetiapine 300 mg/day (n=181), or placebo (n=181). Number needed to treat, time to response (> or =50% reduction from baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score) and time to remission (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score < or =12) were evaluated. Response rates at week 8 were 58.2 and 57.6% for quetiapine 600 and 300 mg/day, respectively, and 36.1% for placebo (P<0.001). Remission rates were 52.9% for both quetiapine groups and 28.4% for placebo (P<0.001). The number needed to treat was five for both response and remission for quetiapine (600 and 300 mg/day) compared with placebo. Median time to response and remission were significantly shorter with quetiapine 600 and 300 mg/day than placebo. No between-group difference was found in the incidence of treatment-emergent mania or hypomania (quetiapine 600 mg/day: 2.2%, quetiapine 300 mg/day: 3.9, and placebo: 3.9%). In conclusion, quetiapine compared with placebo significantly reduces time to response and remission compared with placebo, and has a favorable number needed to treat.
机译:该分析的目的是通过评估喹硫平单药治疗急性双相型抑郁症患者所需的治疗药物数量以及反应和缓解时间,来阐明喹硫平抗抑郁作用的临床意义。对542名患有I型或II型双相情感障碍(中度至重度抑郁)的患者进行事后分析,随机分为喹硫平600 mg /天(n = 180),喹硫平300 mg /天的双盲治疗8周(n = 181)或安慰剂(n = 181)。评估了所需治疗的次数,缓解时间(蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表总评分从基线降低50%或以上)和缓解时间(蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表总评分<或= 12)。喹硫平600和300 mg /天在第8周的缓解率分别为58.2和57.6%,安慰剂为36.1%(P <0.001)。喹硫平组的缓解率均为52.9%,安慰剂组的缓解率为28.4%(P <0.001)。与安慰剂相比,喹硫平(600和300 mg /天)的缓解和缓解需要治疗的药物数量为5。与安慰剂相比,喹硫平600和300 mg /天的缓解和缓解时间中位数显着缩短。出现治疗性躁狂或轻躁狂的发生率之间未发现组间差异(喹硫平600 mg /天:2.2%,喹硫平300 mg /天:3.9,安慰剂:3.9%)。总之,与安慰剂相比,喹硫平与安慰剂相比显着减少了反应和缓解时间,并且需要大量治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号