【24h】

Author reply

机译:作者回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The letter by Lee and McKenzie in response to our article has drawn readers' attention to the challenges of interpreting and comparing findings from observational studies. The authors quote highly variable outcomes from two observational studies examining the risk of cardio-toxicity in trastuzumab-treated patients, with incidence rates ranging from 3% to 39%. Conflicting observational evidence is not surprising, given the heterogeneity in study designs, including variations in patterns of care of the study population, outcome definitions and the characteristics of populations under study. For example, the differences observed in the studies cited by Lee and McKenzie may, in part, be attributable to exposure to different treatment regimens (37% of the first study cohort were exposed to anthracyclines in contrast with 87% of the second-cohort).
机译:Lee和McKenzie在对我们的文章的答复中引起读者的注意,引起了读者对解释和比较观察性研究结果的挑战的关注。作者引用了两项观察性研究结果的高度可变结果,这些研究研究了曲妥珠单抗治疗患者的心脏毒性风险,其发生率在3%至39%之间。考虑到研究设计的异质性,包括研究人群的照护模式,结果定义和所研究人群的特征等方面的差异,观察证据的矛盾并不奇怪。例如,Lee和McKenzie引用的研究中观察到的差异可能部分归因于暴露于不同的治疗方案(第一个研究队列的37%暴露于蒽环类药物,而第二个队列研究的87%暴露于蒽环类药物) 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号