首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine journal >Cisplatin plus etoposide versus other platin-based regimens for patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials
【24h】

Cisplatin plus etoposide versus other platin-based regimens for patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials

机译:顺铂联合依托泊苷与其他基于铂的方案治疗广泛的小细胞肺癌患者:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: To determine whether the cisplatin plus etoposide (EP) combination was more efficacious and less toxic than other platinum-based regimens for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Methods: We performed an extensive literature search (from their inception to July 2010). Two reviewers independently assessed search results and methodological quality of included studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) were calculated according to a random-effects model. Results: Twelve randomised, controlled trials involving seven different platinum-based chemotherapy regimens were included into this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that compared with EP regimen, irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) might decrease the risk of death (HR = 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.97, P = 0.01) (five trials), unlike the sensitivity analysis (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.02, P = 0.12), progression-free survival (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.05, P = 0.28) and overall response rate (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.93-1.24) that were not superior for IP. IP regimen produced more non-haematological toxicities and less haematological toxicities. One trial found that etoposide + cisplatin + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide and cisplatin + etoposide + ifosfamide regimen might prolong the overall survival respectively. Etoposide + cisplatin + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide regimen also might improve progression-free survival but with high rate of haematological toxicities. None of the other trials included in the study demonstrated a significant improvement in survival. Conclusions: There is no strong evidence that any clinical advantage for extensive small-cell lung carcinoma patients requiring chemotherapy when comparing EP with other platin-based regimens, with exception of IP that might prolong overall survival. The decision to prescribe which chemotherapy should take into consideration both cost and treatment preference.
机译:目的:确定顺铂加依托泊苷(EP)组合是否比其他铂类方案对广泛期小细胞肺癌患者更有效,毒性更低。方法:我们进行了广泛的文献检索(从成立到2010年7月)。两名审稿人独立评估了纳入研究的搜索结果和方法学质量。根据随机效应模型计算汇总风险比(HRs)和相对风险(RRs)。结果:这项荟萃分析包括十二项随机对照试验,涉及七种不同的铂类化疗方案。荟萃分析显示,与EP方案相比,伊立替康联合顺铂(IP)可以降低死亡风险(HR = 0.87,95%置信区间(CI)0.78-0.97,P = 0.01)(五项试验),与敏感性分析(HR = 0.91,95%CI 0.81-1.02,P = 0.12),无进展生存期(HR = 0.95,95%CI 0.86-1.05,P = 0.28)和总体缓解率(RR 1.08,95%CI 0.93-1.24),这在IP方面并不出色。 IP方案产生更多的非血液学毒性和较少的血液学毒性。一项试验发现依托泊苷+顺铂+表柔比星+环磷酰胺和顺铂+依托泊苷+异环磷酰胺方案可能分别延长总生存期。依托泊苷+顺铂+表柔比星+环磷酰胺方案也可能改善无进展生存期,但血液学毒性较高。该研究中包括的其他试验均未显示生存率有明显改善。结论:没有强有力的证据表明,将EP与其他基于铂的方案进行比较时,需要化疗的广泛小细胞肺癌患者具有任何临床优势,IP可能会延长总体生存期。决定哪种化疗应同时考虑费用和治疗偏好的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号