首页> 外文期刊>Injury >A biomechanical comparison of the antegrade inserted universal femoral nail with the retrograde inserted universal tibial nail for use in femoral shaft fractures.
【24h】

A biomechanical comparison of the antegrade inserted universal femoral nail with the retrograde inserted universal tibial nail for use in femoral shaft fractures.

机译:用于股骨干骨折的顺行插入通用股骨钉与逆行插入通用胫骨钉的生物力学比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Femoral shaft fractures with and without bony contact were simulated in cadaver specimens fixed with one of two different types of intramedullary locked nail systems; conventional antegrade nail fixation of the femur with the universal AO femoral nail or retrograde insertion in the femur with the universal tibial nail (a smaller diameter slotted nail) were utilized. Mechanical testing simulated one leg stance, and resultant deformation was measured in bending, torsion, and shortening. In stable fractures, fracture stability was similar to both devices, while in unstable fractures, the larger femoral nail was more stable. Furthermore, the simulation of single leg stance led to a coupled deformation of varus bending, axial shortening, and external rotation, which was dependent on bone geometry.
机译:在用两种不同类型的髓内锁定钉系统之一固定的尸体标本中模拟了有无骨接触的股骨干骨折。使用常规的用通用AO股骨钉固定股骨或用通用的胫骨钉(较小直径的开槽钉)将股骨逆行插入股骨。机械测试模拟了一条腿的姿势,并测量了弯曲,扭转和缩短时产生的变形。在稳定的骨折中,骨折的稳定性与两种装置相似,而在不稳定的骨折中,股骨钉越稳定。此外,单腿姿势的模拟导致内翻弯曲,轴向缩短和外旋的耦合变形,这取决于骨骼的几何形状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号