首页> 外文期刊>Industrial Lubrication and Tribology >Investigation of the measurement precision of oil analysis instruments, using fully formulated oils. Part 2: contamination-measuring instruments
【24h】

Investigation of the measurement precision of oil analysis instruments, using fully formulated oils. Part 2: contamination-measuring instruments

机译:研究使用全配方油的油分析仪器的测量精度。第2部分:污染测量仪器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The aim of this study is to determine the variation of the different oil analysis instruments in terms of standard deviation and CV-values, when measuring samples of fully formulated hydraulic and gear oils taken from working systems. Design/methodology/approach - In this investigation two different spectrometric techniques, ICP-OES and RDE-OES, have been studied to determine the instruments' precision of measurement and ability to measure the absolute level of contamination. Findings - The ICP has better precision of measurement of the two instruments, but cannot predict the absolute values of contamination when oil samples are only treated by organic solvent dilution if the samples include large or dense particles. It is therefore not too good, with the sample pretreatment method used, at detecting wear processes that produce dense/large particles, such as pitting failure. For instance, microwave-assisted acid digestion could be used for sample pre-treating to obtain accurate results in that case. It should, however, be able to detect wear mechanisms that produce small particles such as abrasive wear in any case: the ICP has a repeatability value of r = 3 per cent and a reproducibility value of R = 12 per cent for contamination levels of between 50-400 PPM and r = 0.6 PPM and R = 2 PPM, respectively, at values below 50 PPM; the RDE cannot predict the absolute value of contamination if this includes large or dense particles if proper sample pre-treatment is not used. It is therefore not good at detecting wear mechanisms that produce dense/large particles (if the oil samples are not pre-treated properly) such as pitting but should be able to detect abrasive wear and similar processes that produce small particles in any case; the RDE's precision of measurement is not as good as the ICP, with a reproducibility variation of R = r = 25 per cent for contamination levels between 20-500 PPM and R = r = 6 PPM for contamination level below 20 PPM. Research limitations/implications - Measuring only on fully formulated oils from hydraulic and gear systems. Practical implications - The study will be of significant support regarding industrial interpretation of measurement results from the most common oil particle measurement methods. Originality/value - No other similar studies are known.
机译:目的-这项研究的目的是,在测量从工作系统中提取的全配方液压油和齿轮油样品时,确定不同油品分析仪器在标准偏差和CV值方面的差异。设计/方法/方法-在这项研究中,研究了两种不同的光谱技术ICP-OES和RDE-OES,以确定仪器的测量精度和绝对污染水平的测量能力。研究结果-ICP可以更好地测量两种仪器,但是当油样中包含大颗粒或稠密颗粒时,仅通过有机溶剂稀释处理油样时,ICP不能预测污染的绝对值。因此,使用所用的样品预处理方法在检测产生致密/大颗粒(例如点蚀失败)的磨损过程方面不太好。例如,在这种情况下,微波辅助酸消解可用于样品预处理,以获得准确的结果。但是,在任何情况下,它都应该能够检测出产生细小颗粒的磨损机理,例如磨料磨损:ICP的重复性值为r = 3%,而对于污染物的重现性值为R = 12%,R = 12%。在低于50 PPM的值时分别为50-400 PPM和r = 0.6 PPM和R = 2 PPM;如果未进行适当的样品预处理,则RDE无法预测污染的绝对值(如果其中包括大颗粒或稠密颗粒)。因此,它不能很好地检测出产生致密/大颗粒(如果未对油样进行适当的预处理)的磨损机制,例如点蚀,但应能够检测出在任何情况下都会产生小颗粒的磨料磨损和类似过程; RDE的测量精度不如ICP,对于20-500 PPM的污染水平,R = r = 25%,对于低于20 PPM的污染,R = r = 6 PPM,重现性变化为。研究局限/意义-仅对液压和齿轮系统中的全配方油进行测量。实际意义-该研究将对最常见油粒测量方法的测量结果的工业解释提供重要支持。创意/价值-没有其他类似的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号