首页> 外文期刊>Brain research >Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval.
【24h】

Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval.

机译:区分源记忆和项目记忆:编码和检索时的大脑潜能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Vivid memory for an episode generally includes memory for a central object or event plus memory for background context or source information. To assess neural differences between source and item memory, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to monitor relevant memory processes at both encoding and retrieval. Participants fluent in Chinese studied Chinese words superimposed on a square or circular background during the study phase, followed by a 1-min delay. Then, memory was tested for both the words (items) and the corresponding background (source), or, in other blocks, tested for the words alone. ERPs to study-phase words differed as a function of whether the word was later remembered. These Dm effects in the interval from 400 to 600 ms, however, did not differ according to whether or not source was remembered. In contrast, ERPs to test-phase words showed clear oldew effects that did differ across conditions. When both item and source were remembered accurately, oldew effects emerged earlier andwere larger in amplitude than when source memory was either incorrect or not queried. These results demonstrate that encoding processes indexed by ERPs may have primarily reflected encoding of the visual and semantic properties of these words, stressing item memory over source memory. Retrieval processes indexed by ERPs, in contrast, likely reflected a combination of item retrieval, source retrieval, and related processing engaged when people were remembering words seen earlier.
机译:情节的生动内存通常包括中央对象或事件的内存,以及背景上下文或源信息的内存。为了评估源记忆和项目记忆之间的神经差异,我们使用了事件相关电位(ERP)来监视编码和检索过程中的相关记忆过程。在研究阶段,参加汉语流利的汉语学习者将汉语单词叠加在正方形或圆形背景上,然后延迟1分钟。然后,测试单词(项目)和相应背景(源)的记忆,或者在其他块中,单独测试单词。研究阶段单词的ERP随单词是否后来被记住而有所不同。但是,这些Dm效应在400到600毫秒的间隔内,根据是否记住信号源而没有不同。相反,ERP到测试阶段的单词显示出清晰的旧/新效果,在不同情况下确实有所不同。与源存储器不正确或不被查询时相比,准确地记住项目和源时,旧/新效果出现得更早并且幅度更大。这些结果表明,由ERPs索引的编码过程可能主要反映了这些单词的视觉和语义属性的编码,从而使项目存储重于源存储。相比之下,ERP索引的检索过程很可能反映了人们想起早先看到的单词时所进行的项目检索,源检索和相关处理的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号