首页> 外文期刊>Biocontrol Science and Technology >Diversity of natural enemies in Central Otago, New Zealand apple orchards: a practical measure of sustainability in pest management?
【24h】

Diversity of natural enemies in Central Otago, New Zealand apple orchards: a practical measure of sustainability in pest management?

机译:新西兰中奥塔哥苹果园中天敌的多样性:有害生物管理中可持续性的切实可行的衡量标准?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The diversity of the arthropod fauna in apple orchards in Central Otago was recorded from 1994 to 1999 using beating trays, pitfall traps, and sticky traps and the data analysed by the Shannon-Wiener Index. Three different fruit production systems were compared, conventional (CFP), integrated (IFP), and biological (BFP), to determine whether total arthropod diversity and/or the diversity of natural enemies (predators and parasitoids) could be used to measure the sustainability of their pest management practices. The contribution of natural enemies to the diversity indices was also examined to determine if they reflected the key species essential for sustainable pest management. The diversity of natural enemies in beating trays was found to be the measure most sensitive to changes in pest management. The diversity of both the total arthropod fauna and natural enemies was much lower under CFP than under either IFP or BFP, due to the use of broad-spectrum pesticides. This practice made the CFP programme unsustainable and it is no longer used. During the transition from CFP to IFP, the diversity indices rose to become similar to that in the BFP programme by the third season. The introduction of frequent applications of fungicides in BFP, including lime sulphur, appeared to reduce total arthropod and natural enemy diversity. Falls in the diversity indices for natural enemies were shown to reflect reduced numbers, range, and evenness of natural enemies but not necessarily the key species known to be critical for sustainable pest management. It is proposed that a Shannon-Wiener Index for natural enemies in beating trays of 0.2 or less in summer is strongly indicative of unsustainable pest management in Otago apple orchards. On the other hand, indices of 0.3-0.8, as found under IFP and BFP, do not give unequivocal or quantitative indications of the sustainability of pest management. A suite of other measures of sustainability are more useful, notably combining lower pesticide use, reduced pest damage and presence at harvest, the greater roles of key natural enemies, more effective plant resistance to pests and diseases, and higher profitability.
机译:1994年至1999年,使用跳动托盘,陷阱陷阱和粘性陷阱记录了奥塔哥中部苹果园节肢动物的多样性,并通过Shannon-Wiener指数对数据进行了分析。比较了三种不同的水果生产系统,传统的(CFP),综合的(IFP)和生物的(BFP),以确定是否可以使用节肢动物总的多样性和/或天敌的多样性(天敌和寄生虫)来衡量可持续性。他们的害虫管理实践。还检查了天敌对多样性指数的贡献,以确定它们是否反映了可持续虫害管理必不可少的关键物种。人们发现,殴打盘中天敌的多样性是对害虫管理变化最敏感的措施。由于使用了广谱杀虫剂,在CFP中节肢动物的总动植物和天敌的多样性都大大低于IFP或BFP。这种做法使CFP程序难以为继,并且不再使用。在从CFP过渡到IFP的过程中,到第三季,多样性指数变得与BFP计划中的相似。在BFP中频繁使用杀真菌剂,包括石灰硫,似乎减少了节肢动物的总数和天敌的多样性。研究表明,天敌多样性指数的下降反映了天敌数量,范围和均匀性的降低,但不一定是已知对可持续虫害管理至关重要的关键物种。有人提出,夏季跳动托盘中自然天敌的香农-维纳指数为0.2或更低,强烈表明奥塔哥苹果园的虫害管理不可持续。另一方面,IFP和BFP下的0.3-0.8的指数并未明确或定量地表明有害生物管理的可持续性。一系列其他可持续性措施更有用,特别是结合使用更少的农药,减少害虫的损害和收获时的存在,关键天敌的更大作用,更有效的植物对病虫害的抵抗力和更高的盈利能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号