首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Dairy Science >Relative effectiveness of best linear unbiased prediction-animal model vis-a-vis other sire evaluation methods for genetic evaluation of Murrah sires
【24h】

Relative effectiveness of best linear unbiased prediction-animal model vis-a-vis other sire evaluation methods for genetic evaluation of Murrah sires

机译:最佳线性无偏预测动物模型相对于其他父本评估方法在穆拉父本遗传评估中的相对有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

First lactation milk production records of965 Murrah buffaloes sired by 98 bulls were analyzed to estimate breeding values of sires using best linear unbiased prediction animal model (BLUP-AM), best linear unbiased prediction sire model (BLUP-SM), simple regressed least squares (SRLS) and leastsquares methods (LSQ) of sire evaluation. The effectiveness of the methods was judged using various criteria, viz. error variance, coefficient of determination, coefficient of variation and rank correlation. The highest (2428.02 kg) and lowest (1274.62 kg) average breeding values were obtained by LSQ method. BLUP-AM had the lowest error variance and highest (44.97%) R2 value and was adjudged as the most efficient and accurate method compared with others. The CV values of the population by different methods of sire evaluation were more or less similar except BLUP-AM method. The values ranged from 23.59% in BLUP-AM to 26.03 in SRLS method. The rank correlations between expected breeding values for first lactation 305-day milk yield by BLUP-SM and BLUP-AMwere the highest (0.94 ± 0.001). The rank correlations of LSQ with either of BLUP-SM or BLUP-AM were almost close and more than 0.75. The rank correlations of BLUP-SM with SRLS and SRLS with BLUP-AM were found to be 0.69 and 0.62. The rank correlationsof LSQ with SRLS were found to 0.78. It was concluded based on all the criteria to compare theeffectiveness of different methods that BLUP-AM method was more efficient and accurate compared to other methods owing to lowest error variance and highest Revalue.
机译:使用最佳线性无偏预测动物模型(BLUP-AM),最佳线性无偏预测动物模型(BLUP-SM),简单回归最小二乘(父亲评估的SRLS和最小二乘法(LSQ)。使用各种标准来判断方法的有效性。误差方差,确定系数,变异系数和秩相关。通过LSQ方法获得的最高(2428.02 kg)和最低(1274.62 kg)平均育种值。 BLUP-AM具有最低的误差方差和最高的R2值(44.97%),被认为是与其他方法相比最有效,最准确的方法。除BLUP-AM方法外,通过不同父亲评估方法得出的人群CV值基本相似。该值的范围从BLUP-AM中的23.59%到SRLS方法中的26.03。 BLUP-SM和BLUP-AM首次泌乳305天产奶量的预期育种值之间的等级相关性最高(0.94±0.001)。 LSQ与BLUP-SM或BLUP-AM的等级相关性几乎接近且大于0.75。发现带有SRLS的BLUP-SM和带有BLUP-AM的SRLS的等级相关性分别为0.69和0.62。 LSQ与SRLS的等级相关性为0.78。根据所有标准得出结论,比较不同方法的有效性,由于误差方差最低和重估值最高,BLUP-AM方法比其他方法更有效和准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号