...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Dairy Science >Relative accuracy of various methods of estimating milk yield from sample day production in crossbred cows.
【24h】

Relative accuracy of various methods of estimating milk yield from sample day production in crossbred cows.

机译:估算杂种奶牛从样品日生产中产奶量的各种方法的相对准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

168 crossbred (Holstein-Friesian X Hariana) cows were maintained from 1969-85 at the Department of Animal Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India. Cows were milked twice a day at approximately 12 h intervals from the 5th day of calving to the end of lactation (between 200 and 300 days), and samples were combined to give the actual lactation yield. Three methods of estimating milk yield: centring date (CDM), test interval (TIM) and sample day production (SPM) were assessed for accuracy. For CDM, samples were taken at regular intervals of 30, 40, 50 and 60 days. For TIM and SPM, samples were taken irregularly - the duration of each test interval being chosen randomly. There were 5 sampling plans: AM+PM (both morning and evening), all-AM (only mornings), all-PM (only evenings), AM-PM (mornings and evenings alternately) and PM-AM (evenings and mornings alternately). The average error in estimated milk yield for each method is tabulated without adjustment, with adjustment for the shape of the lactation curve (SA) and with adjustment for both SA and diurnal variation (SDA). Adjustments reduced the average error in all 3 methods, and more so when the shorter sampling intervals (30-40 days) were used. Varying the sampling interval did not affect the average error. The PM-AM sampling plan gave an average error closest to that of the AM+PM plan. There were no significant differences in relative efficiency between the 3 sampling schemes, but relative efficiency decreased as the sampling interval increased for all 3 schemes. Adjustments could improve the efficiency by no more than 1%.
机译:1969年至85年,印度希萨尔乔杜里·查兰·辛格·哈里亚纳邦农业大学动物育种系饲养了168头杂种(Holstein-Friesian X Hariana)奶牛。从产犊第5天到泌乳结束(200至300天)之间,大约每天间隔12小时,每天两次挤奶,并合并样品以得出实际的泌乳量。评估了三种估计牛奶产量的方法:定心日期(CDM),测试间隔(TIM)和样品日产量(SPM)的准确性。对于CDM,以30、40、50和60天的固定间隔取样。对于TIM和SPM,不定期取样-随机选择每个测试间隔的持续时间。有5个采样计划:AM + PM(上午和晚上),全AM(仅早晨),全PM(仅晚上),AM-PM(上午和晚上交替)和PM-AM(晚上和早晨交替) )。每种方法估计的牛奶产量的平均误差都以表格形式列出,无需进行调整,调整泌乳曲线(SA)的形状以及调整SA和昼夜变化(SDA)。调整减少了所有3种方法的平均误差,当使用较短的采样间隔(30-40天)时,误差会更大。改变采样间隔不会影响平均误差。 PM-AM采样计划给出的平均误差最接近AM + PM计划的平均误差。三种采样方案之间的相对效率没有显着差异,但是相对效率随着所有三种方案的采样间隔的增加而降低。调整可使效率提高不超过1%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号