...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian Dental Journal >Comparison of efficacy of fluconazole mouthrinse and clotrimazole mouthpaint in the treatment of oral candidiasis
【24h】

Comparison of efficacy of fluconazole mouthrinse and clotrimazole mouthpaint in the treatment of oral candidiasis

机译:氟康唑漱口水和克霉唑漱口水治疗口腔念珠菌病疗效比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Candidiasis is by far the most common oral fungal infection in humans and has a variety of clinical features. It is considered to be an opportunistic infection, affecting individuals who are debilitated by another disease. Fluconazole, one of the newer azoles available for systemic use and clotrimazole as a topical ointment are both shown to be effective in the treatment of oral candidiasis and are considered to be well tolerated and useful medications. No study has evaluated the comparison of clinical and mycological response of oral candidiasis to fluconazole mouthrinse and clotrimazole mouthpaint. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluconazole mouthrinse and compare it with clotrimazole mouthpaint in the treatment of oral candidiasis.
机译:念珠菌病是迄今为止人类最常见的口腔真菌感染,并具有多种临床特征。它被认为是机会性感染,影响因另一种疾病而虚弱的人。氟康唑是一种可全身使用的新型唑类药物,克霉唑为局部用药膏,已被证明在治疗口腔念珠菌病方面有效,并且被认为具有良好的耐受性和有用的药物。尚无研究评估口腔念珠菌病对氟康唑漱口水和克霉唑漱口水的临床和真菌学反应的比较。这项研究的目的是评估氟康唑漱口水的疗效,并将其与克霉唑漱口水进行比较,以治疗口腔念珠菌病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号