首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Supracondylar femoral fractures in elderly patients treated with the dynamic condylar screw and the retrograde intramedullary nail: a comparative study of the two methods.
【24h】

Supracondylar femoral fractures in elderly patients treated with the dynamic condylar screw and the retrograde intramedullary nail: a comparative study of the two methods.

机译:动力con螺钉和逆行髓内钉治疗老年患者con上股骨骨折:两种方法的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to present the results of surgical management of supracondylar fractures of the femur (types A and C according to the AO/ASIF classification) in elderly patients with the use of two different methods of fixation: the mini open dynamic condylar screw fixation (DCS) and the closed retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with supracondylar fractures of the femur were treated from January 1994 to June 2000 and 72 of them followed up completely. There were 25 (34%) men and 47 (65%) women with a median age of 73.2 years (range 60-88 years). In patients with the same type of fracture, the chosen method was random, one after the other (alternately). RIN was used in 35 patients, and DCS was used in 37. The mean operative time for the DCS fixation group was 145 min (range 115-180 min), whereas for the RIN group it was 92 min (range 76-110 min) (p<0.001) with an average estimated blood loss of 310 cc (range 120-450 cc) and 118 cc(range 90-165 cc), respectively (p<0.001). The mean follow-up was 28 months (range 18-42 months). RESULTS: According to the criteria set by Schatzker and Lambert, excellent results were recorded in 18 (51%), good in 11 (31%), moderate in 3 (9%), poor in 3 (9%) patients with RIN and excellent in 19 (51%), good in 11 (30%), moderate in 4 (11%) and poor in 3 (8%) patients with DCS (p>0.05). The complications that occurred in the RIN group were 2 (6%) stiffness of the knee (mean flexion 80 degrees), 2 (6%) non-unions, 2 (6%) varus deformity and in the DCS group 2 (5%) haematomas, 4 (11%) stiffness of the knee (mean flexion 73 degrees) and 2 (5%) non-unions. CONCLUSION: Although the two methods appear to have the same percentage of excellent results and same time to bony union, RIN is preferable to DCS in terms of less blood loss and shorter operating time.
机译:简介:本研究的目的是通过两种不同的固定方法,对老年患者的股骨con上(骨折(根据AO / ASIF分类,分为A型和C型)进行手术治疗,以提供结果。动态con骨螺钉固定(DCS)和闭合逆行髓内钉(RIN)。材料与方法:1994年1月至2000年6月,收治了80例股骨con上骨折患者,其中72例得到了随访。有25位(34%)男性和47位(65%)女性,平均年龄为73.2岁(范围为60-88岁)。在具有相同类型骨折的患者中,选择的方法是随机的,一个接一个(另一个)。 35例患者使用RIN,37例使用DCS。DCS固定组的平均手术时间为145分钟(115-180分钟),而RIN组为92分钟(76-110分钟) (p <0.001),平均估计失血量分别为310 cc(范围为120-450 cc)和118 cc(范围为90-165 cc)(p <0.001)。平均随访28个月(范围18-42个月)。结果:根据Schatzker和Lambert设定的标准,RIN和RIN分别有18例(51%),11例(31%),3例(9%),3例(9%)差,3例(9%)差的优异结果。 DCS患者中有19例(51%)优秀,11例(30%)良好,4例(11%)中度,3例(8%)较差(p> 0.05)。 RIN组发生的并发症为2(6%)的膝盖僵硬(平均屈曲80度),2(6%)的不愈合,2(6%)内翻畸形,DCS组为2(5% )血肿,膝盖僵硬4次(11%)(平均屈曲度为73度)和不愈合2个(5%)。结论:尽管两种方法似乎具有相同百分比的优异结果和相同的骨结合时间,但从失血少,手术时间短的角度来看,RIN比DCS更可取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号