首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: A Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Research >Clinical response and tolerability to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis previously treated with infliximab or abatacept: open-label extension of the ATTEST Study.
【24h】

Clinical response and tolerability to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis previously treated with infliximab or abatacept: open-label extension of the ATTEST Study.

机译:先前接受英夫利昔单抗或阿巴西普治疗的类风湿关节炎患者的临床反应和对阿巴西普的耐受性:ATTEST研究的开放标签扩展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of abatacept in biological-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate treated in the long-term extension (LTE) of the ATTEST trial. METHODS: Patients randomly assigned to abatacept, placebo or infliximab completing the 1-year double-blind period were eligible to receive abatacept approximately 10 mg/kg in the open-label LTE. Efficacy to year 2 is presented for patients randomly assigned to abatacept or infliximab who switched to open-label abatacept. Safety data are presented for all patients entering LTE regardless of double-blind treatment. RESULTS: Of 431 patients randomly assigned, 79.8% remained on abatacept at year 2. At years 1 and 2, 19.7% and 26.1% of abatacept and 13.3% and 28.6% of infliximab-to-abatacept patients achieved disease activity score 28-defined remission (<2.6). Safety with abatacept during the cumulative study period was consistent with the double-blind experience, with no increase in adverse event incidence following the switch to abatacept. CONCLUSION: In methotrexate-inadequate responders, abatacept efficacy was maintained over 2 years. For infliximab-to-abatacept patients, efficacy improvements were seen in year 2 after patients switched to abatacept. Switching directly from infliximab to abatacept was well tolerated. These data demonstrate that abatacept provides sustained responses and consistent safety, suggesting that switching from infliximab to abatacept is a viable treatment option.
机译:目的:评估阿巴西普在初生类风湿性关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性,并在ATTEST试验的长期扩展(LTE)中对甲氨蝶呤治疗反应不足。方法:随机分配接受abatacept,安慰剂或英夫利昔单抗完成1年双盲期的患者,有资格在开放标签LTE中接受约10 mg / kg abatacept的治疗。随机分配到abatacept或infliximab并改用开放标签abatacept的患者至2年级的疗效。无论采用双盲治疗,都会为所有进入LTE的患者提供安全性数据。结果:在随机分配的431例患者中,第2年仍使用abatacept的患者为79.8%。在第1和第2年,abatacept的患者分别为19.7%和26.1%,英夫利昔单抗治疗的患者的13.3%和28.6%达到了疾病活动性评分28分缓解(<2.6)。在累积研究期间使用abatacept的安全性与双盲经验一致,转用abatacept后不良事件的发生率没有增加。结论:在甲氨蝶呤反应不充分者中,阿巴西普疗效维持2年以上。对于英夫利昔单抗至abatacept的患者,患者改用abatacept后的第2年观察到疗效改善。从英夫利昔单抗直接转换为阿巴西普的耐受性良好。这些数据表明,阿巴西普可提供持续的反应和一致的安全性,表明从英夫利昔单抗转为阿巴西普是一种可行的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号