首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

机译:单任务和双任务训练对老年人平衡性能的影响:一项双盲,随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of 3 different approaches to balance training on dual-task balance performance in older adults with balance impairment. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (N=23) with balance impairment (mean age, 74.8y). They scored 52 or less on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and/or walked with a self-selected gait speed of 1.1m/s or less. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 interventions: single-task training, dual-task training with fixed-priority instructions, and dual-task training with variable-priority instructions. Participants received 45-minute individualized training sessions, 3 times a week for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait speed under single-task and dual-task conditions was obtained at baseline, the second week, the end of training, and the twelfth week after the end of training. Other measures, including the BBS and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, were collected at baseline and after training. RESULTS: Participants in all groups improved on the BBS (P<.001; effect size [ES]=.72), and walked significantly faster after training (P=.02; ES=.27). When a cognitive task was added, however, only participants who received dual-task training with fixed-priority instructions and dual-task training with variable-priority instructions exhibited significant improvements in gait speed (P<.001, ES=.57; and P<.001, ES=.46, respectively). In addition, only the dual-task training with variable-priority instructions group demonstrated a dual-task training effect at the second week of training and maintained the training effect at the 12-week follow-up. Only the single-task training group showed a significant increase on the ABC after training (P<.001; ES=.61). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-task training is effective in improving gait speed under dual-task conditions in elderly participants with balance impairment. Training balance under single-task conditionsmay not generalize to balance control during dual-task contexts. Explicit instruction regarding attentional focus is an important factor contributing to the rate of learning and the retention of the dual-task training effect.
机译:目的:比较三种平衡训练方法对有平衡障碍的老年人的双任务平衡表现的影响。设计:一项双盲,随机对照试验。地点:大学研究实验室。参与者:老年人(N = 23)有平衡障碍(平均年龄74.8y)。他们在Berg平衡量表(BBS)上得分为52分或以下,和/或以1.1m / s以下的自行选择的步态速度行走。干预措施:将参与者随机分配到3种干预措施中的1种:单任务训练,固定优先级指令的双任务训练和可变优先级指令的双任务训练。参与者接受了45分钟的个性化培训,每周3次,共4周。主要观察指标:在基线,训练的第二周,训练结束和训练结束后的第十二周,获得单任务和双任务条件下的步态速度。在基线和训练后收集了其他措施,包括BBS和特定于活动的平衡信心(ABC)量表。结果:所有组的参与者在BBS上均得到改善(P <.001;效应大小[ES] =。72),并且在训练后行走明显更快(P = .02; ES = .27)。但是,当添加认知任务时,只有接受固定优先级指令的双任务训练和可变优先级指令的双任务训练的参与者的步态速度显着提高(P <.001,ES = .57;和P <.001,ES = .46)。此外,只有具有可变优先级指令的双任务训练组在训练的第二周表现出双任务训练效果,并在12周的随访中保持训练效果。仅单项训练组在训练后显示ABC显着增加(P <.001; ES = .61)。结论:双任务训练可以有效地提高平衡障碍的老年参与者在双任务条件下的步态速度。单任务条件下的训练平衡可能无法推广到双任务环境下的平衡控制。关于注意力集中的明确指导是影响学习率和保持双任务训练效果的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号