首页> 外文期刊>Area >Iterative parallelism as research praxis: embracing the discursive incommensurability of scholarship and everyday politics
【24h】

Iterative parallelism as research praxis: embracing the discursive incommensurability of scholarship and everyday politics

机译:迭代并行性作为研究实践:拥抱学术和日常政治的话语不可通约性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Discussions of geography's role outside the academy have tended toward arguments for greater public relevance, either by revising the discipline's empirical foci, or by adopting more public-oriented or activist approaches to research. While we are sympathetic to these ideas, we see an inherent tension between the discursive goals of academic scholarship and the everyday political world beyond it. Political discourse makes productive use of signifiers for which multiple meanings already exist, and gains power by exploiting their ambiguity. Academic discourse, on the other hand, seeks to clarify meanings through definitions and carefully delimited empirics in order to elucidate new ideas. We argue that the recognition and appreciation of these divergent discursive goals can serve efforts to make geographic scholarship more widely relevant if scholars make academic contributions iteratively parallel to political ones, rather than attempting to blend the two as a simultaneous practice. Scholarship that works to produce and utilise analytical terms of art within scholarly discourses to more accurately describe political processes can enable new critiques and the imagination of new political possibilities that are difficult to conceptualise from within everyday political discourses. The most strategic way for a scholar to make a political intervention, however, is to frame the suggestion within existing political discourses. Therefore, contributions in each discourse serve specific, unique purposes. The two discourses can also usefully play off of each other. When new political practices arise in the everyday political realm, new research projects can usefully evaluate their impacts to inform further suggestions for political interventions. We elucidate these ideas in three principles to guide an academic praxis of iterative parallelism for scholars interested in making political impacts alongside their scholarship.
机译:通过修改学科的经验重点,或者通过采用面向公众或激进主义者的研究方法,人们在学院外对地理角色的讨论趋向于与公众具有更大的相关性。尽管我们对这些想法表示同情,但我们看到学术学术的话语目标与超越其的日常政治世界之间存在着内在的张力。政治话语有效地使用了已经存在多种含义的指称符,并通过利用它们的歧义来获得权力。另一方面,学术话语试图通过定义来澄清含义,并仔细界定经验,以阐明新思想。我们认为,如果学者反复地与政治活动平行地做出学术贡献,而不是试图将两者融合为一种同时的实践,那么对这些不同的话语目标的认可和欣赏就可以有助于使地理奖学金更加广泛地相关。旨在产生和利用学术话语中的艺术分析术语来更准确地描述政治过程的奖学金,可以带来新的批评和新政治可能性的想象力,而这些新政治可能性很难从日常政治话语中概念化。然而,学者进行政治干预的最具战略意义的方法是在现有的政治话语中构筑这一建议。因此,在每种话语中的贡献都具有特定的独特目的。这两种话语也可以相互有益地发挥作用。当日常政治领域出现新的政治实践时,新的研究项目可以有效地评估其影响,从而为政治干预提供更多建议。我们从三个原则中阐明这些思想,以指导有兴趣在学术上与政治产生影响的学者进行迭代并行性的学术实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号