首页> 外文期刊>Applied neuropsychology. Child >Comparing Test Scores Using Information From Criterion-Related Validity Studies
【24h】

Comparing Test Scores Using Information From Criterion-Related Validity Studies

机译:使用来自与标准相关的有效性研究中的信息比较测试成绩

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is frequently a need to compare a client's test scores from different instruments. If the scores come from instruments that use the same scale, it is tempting to compare the scores directly. Unfortunately, this method can lead clinicians to believe that there is a large difference between scores when the difference is minimal. As an alternative, we outline a method for score comparison that uses information from criterion-related validity studies. Using three examples, we show why this method is more psychometrically sound, produces more accurate comparison scores, and requires little extra work for clinicians than the direct comparison approach. To make the score comparison process easy for clinicians to use, we include an appendix that demonstrates how to implement this method in Microsoft Excel and the free R program.
机译:经常需要比较不同工具的客户的考试成绩。如果分数来自使用相同音阶的乐器,则倾向于直接比较分数。不幸的是,当差异最小时,这种方法会使临床医生相信分数之间存在较大差异。作为替代方案,我们概述了一种分数比较方法,该方法使用了与标准相关的有效性研究中的信息。通过三个示例,我们说明了为什么这种方法在心理上更合理,产生更准确的比较分数,并且与直接比较方法相比,对于临床医生而言几乎不需要额外的工作。为了使分数比较过程易于临床医生使用,我们提供了一个附录,该附录演示了如何在Microsoft Excel和免费R程序中实现此方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号