首页> 外文期刊>Area >Exploring weather-related experiences and practices: Examining methodological approaches
【24h】

Exploring weather-related experiences and practices: Examining methodological approaches

机译:探索与天气有关的经验和做法:检查方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

With projected climate change, it is increasingly important to understand the current role of weather in everyday life and how it may change in the future. This paper evaluates two qualitative research approaches for their ability to generate insight into weather-related experiences and everyday practices. As these mundane day-to-day weather interactions often escape memory over time, the paper calls into question the ability of conventional methodological approaches that rely on recall to accurately excavate these events. The research examined serial one-on-one, semi-structured interviews with an adapted short-term focus, and daily diary-photographs. Each approach was applied to one of two Australian cities with sharply contrasting climates - Melbourne and Darwin. Both approaches were able to generate insight into weather-related experiences and practices. However, both presented problems. In interviews, these problems related to retrospective accounts beyond 'yesterday', where physical experience recollections became limited. For diary-photographs, inspiring participants to continually complete and submit contributions proved problematic. I argue that interviews are better for documenting routine practice and generalised experiences, while diary-photographs are better at showing fine-grained detail of physical experiences. Where both aspects are sought, as in this study, a combination is possible. However, using dual methods increases the risk of participant fatigue.
机译:随着预计的气候变化,了解天气在日常生活中的当前作用以及未来的变化将变得越来越重要。本文评估了两种定性研究方法的能力,以了解与天气相关的经验和日常实践。由于这些平凡的日常天气交互作用经常会随着时间的流逝而失去记忆,因此本文质疑了依靠召回来准确发掘这些事件的常规方法的能力。这项研究对连续的一对一,半结构化访谈进行了研究,并采用了经过调整的短期重点和每日日记照片。每种方法都适用于两个气候截然相反的澳大利亚城市之一-墨尔本和达尔文。两种方法都能够深入了解与天气有关的经验和做法。但是,两者都存在问题。在访谈中,这些问题与“昨天”之后的回顾性陈述有关,在那之后,对身体经验的记忆变得有限。对于日记照片,激励参与者不断完成并提交文稿是有问题的。我认为,访谈更适合记录日常实践和一般性的经历,而日记照片则更能显示身体经历的细粒度细节。如本研究中在寻求两个方面的情况下,都可以组合。但是,使用双重方法会增加参与者疲劳的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号