首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound are not interchangeable in diagnosing abnormal bones
【24h】

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound are not interchangeable in diagnosing abnormal bones

机译:双能X线骨密度仪和定量超声在诊断异常骨骼方面不可互换

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To evaluate whether dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) classify the same children as 'abnormal' (SD (z) score (SDS) ≤-2). Methods:Speed of sound (SOS) was measured at the radius and tibia using QUS and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) using DXA in 621 subjects aged 5-20 years; healthy 412, cystic fibrosis 117 and obese 92. Results:BMD SDS positively (p<0.001) and tibia SOS SDS negatively correlated with size (p<0.05). Disagreement between DXA and QUS for 'abnormal' scans occurred in 6-31%. Those with abnormal BMD and normal SOS SDS had lower mean BMI SDS than those with normal BMD and abnormal SOS SDS. SOS measurements were unobtainable in some children, especially in the obese group. Conclusions:DXA and QUS identify different individuals as 'abnormal'. Agreement between BMD and tibia SOS is lower in obese subjects. Without a gold-standard, it is difficult to determine which technique is more 'correct'.
机译:目的:评估双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)和定量超声(QUS)是否将同一儿童归类为“异常”(SD(z)得分(SDS)≤-2)。方法:对621名年龄在5-20岁的受试者使用QUS测量the骨和胫骨的声速(SOS),使用DXA测量腰椎的骨密度(BMD)。健康412,囊性纤维化117和肥胖92。结果:BMD SDS与大小呈负相关(p <0.05),而胫骨SOS SDS与大小呈负相关。 DXA和QUS对于“异常”扫描的分歧在6-31%之间发生。 BMD异常和SOS SDS正常者的平均BMI SDS低于BMD正常和SOS SDS异常者。在某些儿童中,特别是在肥胖组中,无法获得SOS测量值。结论:DXA和QUS将不同的个体识别为“异常”。肥胖受试者中BMD和胫骨SOS之间的一致性较低。没有黄金标准,很难确定哪种技术更“正确”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号