首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Dose separation does not overcome the pharmacokinetic interaction between fosamprenavir and lopinavir/ritonavir.
【24h】

Dose separation does not overcome the pharmacokinetic interaction between fosamprenavir and lopinavir/ritonavir.

机译:剂量分离不能克服福沙那韦和洛匹那韦/利托那韦之间的药代动力学相互作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous investigations have shown a significant negative two-way drug interaction between fosamprenavir (FPV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients and seronegative volunteers. This randomized, nonblinded, three-way crossover study of HIV-seronegative adult volunteers investigated dose separation and increased doses of RTV as a means to overcome the interaction between FPV and LPV/RTV. Eleven HIV-seronegative volunteers were given FPV plus LPV/RTV at 700 mg plus 400/100 mg every 12 hours (q12h) simultaneously for 10 days and then randomized to receive each of three 7-day treatments in one of six possible sequences, as follows: FPV plus LPV/RTV at 700 mg plus 400 mg/100 mg q12h simultaneously, FPV/RTV at 700 mg/100 mg q12h plus LPV/RTV at 400 mg/100 mg q12h, with doses separated by 4 h, and FPV/RTV at 1,400 mg/200 mg in the morning plus LPV/RTV at 800 mg/200 mg in the evening. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on day 8 of each treatment, andsamples were analyzed for FPV, amprenavir (APV), LPV, and RTV concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios (GMR [with 95% confidence intervals]) for the 4- and 12-h dose separation strategies compared to simultaneous administration were calculated for the areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 24 h. Compared to simultaneous administration, RTV exposures increased with both 4-h and 12-h dose separation strategies (GMR, 5.30 [3.66 to 7.67] and 4.45 [3.09 to 6.41], respectively). LPV exposures also significantly increased with both 4-h and 12-h dose separation strategies (GMR, 1.76 [1.34 to 2.32] and 1.43 [1.02 to 2.01], respectively). However, both the 4- and 12-h strategies resulted in greater reductions in APV exposure (0.67 [0.54 to 0.83] and 0.77 [0.59 to 0.99], respectively) compared to simultaneous administration. Additional investigations are warranted to determine the optimal dosing of FPV with LPV/RTV.
机译:先前的研究表明,在感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的患者和血清阴性志愿者中,福沙那韦(FPV)和洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV / RTV)之间存在显着的负向双向药物相互作用。这项针对HIV血清阴性成人志愿者的随机,无盲,三向交叉研究研究了剂量分离和RTV剂量增加的情况,以此作为克服FPV和LPV / RTV之间相互作用的一种手段。每12小时(q12h)分别向11名HIV阴性的志愿者提供FPV加LPV / RTV 700 mg加400/100 mg,共10天,然后随机分配,以六种可能的顺序之一接受三种7天治疗中的每一种,如下如下:FPV + 700 mg / 100 mg q12h时同时加LPV / RTV,700 mg / 100 mg q12h时FPV / RTV加400 mg / 100 mg q12h时LPV / RTV,剂量分开4 h,FPV / RTV早晨为1,400 mg / 200 mg,晚上LPV / RTV为800 mg / 200 mg。在每个处理的第8天进行药代动力学采样,并通过高效液相色谱-串联质谱分析样品中的FPV,氨普那韦(APV),LPV和RTV浓度。计算了4小时和12小时剂量分离策略与同时给药相比的几何平均比率(GMR [具有95%置信区间]),计算了0至24小时的浓度-时间曲线下的面积。与同时给药相比,在4小时和12小时剂量分离策略下,RTV暴露均增加(分别为GMR,5.30 [3.66至7.67]和4.45 [3.09至6.41])。 LPV暴露在4小时和12小时剂量分离策略下也显着增加(GMR分别为1.76 [1.34至2.32]和1.43 [1.02至2.01])。然而,与同时给药相比,4小时和12小时策略均导致APV暴露量更大的减少(分别为0.67 [0.54至0.83]和0.77 [0.59至0.99])。必须进行其他研究以确定采用LPV / RTV的FPV的最佳剂量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号