...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ergonomics >FMS scores and low-back loading during lifting - Whole-body movement screening as an ergonomic tool?
【24h】

FMS scores and low-back loading during lifting - Whole-body movement screening as an ergonomic tool?

机译:举重过程中的FMS得分和腰背负荷-人体运动筛查是否符合人体工程学?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Previous research suggests that a general whole-body movement screen could be used to identify personal movement attributes that promote potentially injurious low-back loading patterns at work. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between Functional Movement Screen (FMS) composite scores and the low-back loading response to lifting. Methods: Fifteen men who scored greater than 14 on the FMS (high-scorers) and 15 height- and weight-matched low-scorers (FMS < 14) performed sagittally symmetric and asymmetric laboratory-based lifting tasks. A three-dimensional dynamic biomechanical model was used to calculate peak low-back loading levels, and the angle of the lumbar spine was captured at the instant when the peak compressive force was applied. Results: Regardless of the lifting task performed, there were no differences in peak low-back compression (p ≥ 0.4157), anterior/posterior reaction shear (p ≥ 0.5645), or medial/lateral reaction shear (p ≥ 0.2581) forces between the high- and low-scorers. At the instant when peak compressive forces were applied, differences in the lumbar spine angle between high- and low-scores were not statistically significant about the lateral bend (p ≥ 0.4215), axial twist (p ≥ 0.2734), or flexion/extension (p ≥ 0.1354) axes, but there was a tendency for the lumbar spine to be more deviated in the low-scorers. Conclusions: Using the previously established injury prediction threshold value of 14, the composite FMS score was not related to the peak low-back loading magnitudes in lifting. Though not statistically significant, the tendency for the lumbar spines of low-scorers to be more deviated when the peak low-back compression force was imposed could be biomechanically meaningful because spinal load tolerance varies with posture. Future attempts to modify or reinterpret FMS scoring are warranted given that several previous studies have revealed links between composite FMS scores and musculoskeletal complaints.
机译:背景:先前的研究表明,一般的全身运动屏幕可用于识别个人运动属性,从而促进工作中潜在的伤害性腰背负荷模式。这项研究的目的是检查功能性运动筛查(FMS)综合评分与下背部对举重的反应之间的关系。方法:15名在FMS上得分超过14(高得分)和15在身高和体重上匹配的低得分(FMS <14)的人执行了基于实验室的矢状对称和非对称举升任务。使用三维动态生物力学模型来计算峰值腰背负荷水平,并在施加峰值压缩力的瞬间捕获腰椎的角度。结果:无论执行何种抬举任务,各组之间的峰值下背部压缩力(p≥0.4157),前后反剪力(p≥0.5645)或内侧/外侧反剪力(p≥0.2581)均无差异。高低得分。在施加峰值压缩力的那一刻,高和低得分之间的腰椎角度差异在侧弯(p≥0.4215),轴向扭曲(p≥0.2734)或弯曲/伸展( p≥0.1354)轴,但低位者的腰椎有更大的偏移趋势。结论:使用先前建立的伤害预测阈值14,复合FMS得分与举升过程中的低腰背负重幅度无关。尽管在统计学上不显着,但当施加峰值下背部压缩力时,低腰椎腰椎更趋于偏斜的趋势可能具有生物力学意义,因为脊椎负荷耐受性随姿势而变化。鉴于先前的一些研究已经揭示了综合FMS评分与肌肉骨骼疾病之间的联系,因此有必要对FMS评分进行修改或重新解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号