首页> 外文期刊>Angiology: the Journal of Vascular Diseases >Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin, administered primarily at home, with unfractionated heparin, administered in hospital, and subcutaneous heparin, administered at home for deep-vein thrombosis.
【24h】

Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin, administered primarily at home, with unfractionated heparin, administered in hospital, and subcutaneous heparin, administered at home for deep-vein thrombosis.

机译:主要用于家庭的低分子量肝素与用于医院的普通肝素和用于深静脉血栓形成的家用皮下肝素的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, 294 patients with acute proximal DVT (deep venous thrombosis) were randomly assigned to receive intravenous standard heparin in the hospital (98 patients) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (nadroparin 0.1 mL [equivalent to 100 AXa IU] per kg of body weight subcutaneously twice daily) administered primarily at home (outpatients) or alternatively in hospital (97 patients) or subcutaneous calcium heparin (SCHep) (99 patients, 0.5 mL bid) administered directly at home. The study design allowed outpatients taking LMWH heparin to go home immediately and hospitalized patients taking LMWH to be discharged early. Patients treated with standard heparin or LMWH received the oral anticoagulant starting on the second day, and heparin was discontinued when the therapeutic range (INR 2-3) had been reached. Anticoagulant treatment was maintained for 3 months. Patients treated with SCHep were injected twice daily for 3 months without oral anticoagulants. Patients were evaluated for inclusion and follow-up with color duplex scanning. Venography was not used. In case of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) a ventilatory-perfusional lung scan was performed. Endpoints of the study were recurrent or extension of DVT, bleeding, the number of days spent in hospital, and costs of treatments. Of the 325 patients included, 294 completed the study. Dropouts totaled 31 (10.5%); six of the 325 included patients (1.8%) died from the related, neoplastic illness. Recurrence or extension of DVT was observed in 6.1% of patients in the LMWH group, in 6.2% in the standard heparin group, and in 7.1% in the SCHep group. Most recurrences (11/17) were in the first month in all groups. Bleedings were all minor, mostly during hospital stay. Hospital stay in patients treated with LMWH was 1.2+/-1.4 days in comparison with 5.4+/-1.2 in those treated with standard heparin. There was no hospital stay in the SCHep group. Average treatment costs in 3 months in the standard heparin group (US
机译:在这项研究中,将294例急性近端DVT(深静脉血栓形成)患者随机分配到医院接受静脉标准肝素治疗(98例)或低分子量肝素(LMWH)(萘达帕林0.1 mL [相当于100 AXa IU每天皮下注射两次,每公斤体重)主要在家里(门诊病人)或在医院(97例)或直接在家里皮下肝素钙(SCHep)(99例,0.5 mL bid)给药。该研究设计允许服用LMWH肝素的门诊患者立即回家,住院服用LMWH肝素的患者尽早出院。使用标准肝素或LMWH治疗的患者从第二天开始接受口服抗凝剂,并且当达到治疗范围(INR 2-3)时,停用肝素。维持抗凝治疗3个月。 SCHep治疗的患者每天注射两次,持续3个月,无口服抗凝剂。评估患者的包容性并进行彩色双工扫描随访。没有使用静脉造影。如果怀疑有肺栓塞(PE),则进行通气-灌注肺扫描。研究的终点是DVT的复发或扩展,出血,住院天数和治疗费用。在325名患者中,有294名完成了研究。辍学总计31(10.5%); 325名患者中有6名(1.8%)因相关的肿瘤性疾病死亡。 LMWH组中6.1%的患者观察到DVT复发或扩展,标准肝素组中观察到6.2%,SCHep组中观察到7.1%。所有组中大多数患者复发(11/17)。出血很少,主要是在住院期间。用LMWH治疗的患者的住院时间为1.2 +/- 1.4天,而使用标准肝素治疗的患者的住院时间为5.4 +/- 1.2天。 SCHep组没有住院。标准肝素组(美国)在3个月内的平均治疗费用

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号