首页> 外文期刊>Angle Orthodontist >Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.
【24h】

Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.

机译:使用标准弓丝和牙突牙评估常规和自结扎式托槽设计的摩擦阻力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The frictional behavior of four conventional and four self-ligating brackets were simulated using a mechanical testing machine. Analyses of the two-bracket types were completed by drawing samples of three standardized archwires through quadrants of typodont models in the dry/wet states. Pretreatment typodonts of an oral cavity featured progressively malocclused quadrants. As nominal dimensions of the archwires were increased, the drawing forces of all brackets increased at different rates. When coupled with a small wire, the self-ligating brackets performed better than the conventional brackets. For the 0.014-inch wires in the upper right quadrant, the maximum drawing forces averaged 125 and 810 cN for self-ligating and conventional brackets, respectively. When coupled with larger wires, various designs interchangeably displayed superior performance. For the 0.019- x 0.025-inch wires in the upper left quadrant, the maximum drawing forces averaged 1635 and 2080 cN for self-ligating and conventional brackets, respectively. As the malocclusion increased, the drawing forces increased. For example, in the least malocclused quadrant and with the smallest wire, maximum drawing forces for self-ligating and conventional brackets averaged 80 and 810 cN, respectively, whereas in the most malocclused quadrant tested with the same wire size, maximum drawing forces for self-ligating and conventional brackets averaged 870 and 1345 cN, respectively. For maximum values between the dry and wet states, significant differences between ambient states existed only for the In-Ovation brackets in the lower left quadrant. These test outcomes illustrated how bracket design, wire size, malocclusion, and ambient state influenced drawing forces.
机译:使用机械测试机模拟了四个常规支架和四个自绑带的摩擦性能。通过在干/湿状态下通过台齿模型象限绘制三个标准弓丝的样本,完成了两种支架类型的分析。口腔的预处理牙周病特征是渐进性错位象限。随着弓丝标称尺寸的增加,所有支架的拉力以不同的速率增加。当用细金属丝连接时,自结扎支架的性能优于传统支架。对于右上象限中的0.014英寸导线,自结扎支架和常规支架的最大拉拔力分别平均为125和810 cN。当与较大的导线连接时,各种设计可以互换显示出优越的性能。对于左上象限中的0.019英寸x 0.025英寸的导线,自结扎支架和常规支架的最大拉拔力分别平均为1635和2080 cN。随着咬合不正的增加,牵引力也增加。例如,在咬合力最小的象限且导线最小的情况下,自结扎和常规托槽的最大拉力分别为80 cN和810 cN,而在使用相同导线尺寸测试的咬合力最大的象限中,最大拉力为自力。 -结扎支架和常规支架的平均分别为870和1345 cN。对于干态和湿态之间的最大值,仅在左下象限中的In-Ovation括号中存在环境状态之间的显着差异。这些测试结果说明了支架设计,导线尺寸,咬合不良和周围环境如何影响拉拔力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号