...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >Taking the Middle Path in Evaluating Technology in Medical Education
【24h】

Taking the Middle Path in Evaluating Technology in Medical Education

机译:走医学教育技术评估的中间路线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We thank Drs. White and Sharma and Drs. Mali and Wood for sharing their thoughts on podcasting in medical education (White and Sharma 2012; Jalali and Wood 2012). The contrast in their opinions is interesting, with the former believing that the first level of Kirkpatrick's four level evaluation model (reaction: what the learners thought about the training) is sufficient justification for podcasting, while the latter feel that we should target level four (results: the final results that occurred because of the training program)— specifically, we should demonstrate improved patient outcomes as a result of podcasting (Kirkpatrick 1959). Given these disparate views, we would like to reply to each commentary separately.
机译:我们感谢博士。怀特,夏尔马和博士。 Mali和Wood分享了他们在医学教育中播客的想法(White和Sharma 2012; Jalali和Wood 2012)。他们之间的对比很有趣,前者认为柯克帕特里克(Kirkpatrick)的四级评估模型的第一级(反应:学习者对培训的看法)足以进行播客,而后者则认为我们应该针对第四级(结果:由于培训计划而产生的最终结果)-特别是,我们应该证明由于播客而提高了患者的治疗效果(Kirkpatrick 1959)。鉴于这些不同的观点,我们想分别答复每个评论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号