首页> 外文期刊>Computers & education >Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
【24h】

Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

机译:中低收入国家医学教育在线学习评估:系统回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), e-learning for medical education may alleviate the burden of severe health worker shortages and deliver affordable access to high quality medical education. However, diverse challenges in infrastructure and adoption are encountered when implementing e-learning within medical education in particular. Understanding what constitutes successful e-learning is an important first step for determining its effectiveness. The objective of this study was to systematically review e-learning interventions for medical education in LMICs, focusing on their evaluation and assessment methods.Nine databases were searched for publications from January 2007 to June 2017. We included 52 studies with a total of 12,294 participants. Most e-learning interventions were pilot studies (73%), which mainly employed summative assessments of study participants (83%) and evaluated the e-learning intervention with questionnaires (45%). Study designs, evaluation and assessment methods showed considerable variation, as did the study quality, evaluation periods, outcome and effectiveness measures. Included studies mainly utilized subjective measures and custom-built evaluation frameworks, which resulted in both low comparability and poor validity. The majority of studies self-concluded that they had had an effective e-learning intervention, thus indicating potential benefits of e-learning for LMICs. However, MERSQI and NOS ratings revealed the low quality of the studies' evidence for comparability, evaluation instrument validity, study outcomes and participant blinding. Many e-learning interventions were small-scale and conducted as short-termed pilots. More rigorous evaluation methods for e-learning implementations in LMICs are needed to understand the strengths and shortcomings of e-learning for medical education in low-resource contexts. Valid and reliable evaluations are the foundation to guide and improve e-learning interventions, increase their sustainability, alleviate shortages in health care workers and improve the quality of medical care in LMICs.
机译:在中低收入国家(LMIC)中,用于医学教育的在线学习可以减轻严重的卫生工作者短缺的负担,并为人们提供负担得起的高质量医学教育机会。但是,尤其是在医学教育中实施电子学习时,会遇到基础设施和采用方面的各种挑战。了解什么构成成功的电子学习是确定其有效性的重要的第一步。这项研究的目的是系统地评估中低收入国家的医学教育电子学习干预措施,重点是其评估和评估方法。从2007年1月至2017年6月检索了9个数据库的出版物。我们纳入了52项研究,共有12,294名参与者。多数电子学习干预措施是试点研究(73%),主要采用对研究参与者的总结性评估(83%),并通过问卷调查评估电子学习干预措施(45%)。研究设计,评估和评估方法显示出相当大的差异,研究质量,评估期,结果和有效性指标也是如此。纳入的研究主要利用主观措施和定制评估框架,导致可比性低和有效性差。大多数研究得出的结论是,他们已经进行了有效的电子学习干预,从而表明了电子学习对中低收入国家的潜在好处。然而,MERSQI和NOS评分显示,研究的可比性,评估工具有效性,研究结果和参与者盲目性证据质量低。许多电子学习干预措施都是规模较小的,是作为短期试点进行的。为了了解在资源匮乏的情况下医学教育电子学习的优点和缺点,需要在LMIC中采用更严格的评估方法。有效和可靠的评估是指导和改善电子学习干预措施,提高其可持续性,减轻卫生保健工作者短缺以及提高中低收入国家医疗质量的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号