首页> 外文期刊>Blood Pressure Monitoring >Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
【24h】

Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.

机译:在房颤患者中比较Tensoval Duo控制设备和水银血压计时的临床血压测量验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of blood pressure measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation using simultaneous measurements by a mercury sphygmomanometer and an electronic device Tensoval duo control, produced by Hartmann-Rico, with dual control of the measurements (oscillometric and auscultation). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 255 patients were examined at five clinics using two simultaneous measurements with a time interval of at least 3 min. The measurement accuracy analysis was carried out using a paired t-test, at several levels, throughout the whole group of patients, by considering the patient's sex and age and using a standard or larger cuff. Differences between both methods in absolute values were categorized into one of four bands (< 5, < 10, < 15 mmHg and more). Analyses according to the location of participating clinics and higher versus lower pulse rate during examination were also carried out. RESULTS: For systolic blood pressure, the difference of the measured values between the mercury and duo control device was on average 0.1 mmHg [standard deviation = 4.7 (not significant)]. For diastolic blood pressure, the difference in measured values was on average -0.7 mmHg [standard deviation = 4.7, P < 0.05]. The values of diastolic blood pressure measured using duo control were on average 0.7 mmHg higher than the values measured using the mercury sphygmomanometer, whereas in the subgroup using the standard cuff the difference was on average -1.1 mmHg. Subanalyses related to sex, age, location of participating clinics and pulse value higher or lower than 60 bpm did not reveal significant differences. CONCLUSION: Measuring blood pressure using an electronic device with a dual control of measurement provides accurate results even in the case of absolute arrhythmia, such as atrial fibrillation. Minimum differences in the values of diastolic blood pressure are clinically insignificant.
机译:目的:我们研究的目的是比较使用水银血压计和由Hartmann-Rico生产的电子设备Tensoval duo control进行双重测量同时进行测量的双重控制(示波法)对房颤患者的血压测量准确性和听诊)。材料与方法:总共255名患者在五家诊所接受了两次同时测量,检查间隔至少为3分钟。通过考虑患者的性别和年龄并使用标准袖带或更大袖带,在整个患者组中使用多个级别的配对t检验进行测量准确性分析。两种方法之间的绝对值差异归为四个波段之一(<5,<10,<15 mmHg等)。还根据参与诊所的位置以及检查期间较高和较低脉搏率进行了分析。结果:对于收缩压,汞和二重奏控制装置之间的测量值之差平均为0.1 mmHg [标准偏差= 4.7(无显着性)]。对于舒张压,测量值的差异平均为-0.7 mmHg [标准偏差= 4.7,P <0.05]。使用二重对照法测量的舒张压值平均比使用水银血压计测量的值高0.7 mmHg,而在使用标准袖带的亚组中,差异平均为-1.1 mmHg。关于性别,年龄,参与诊所的位置以及脉搏值高于或低于60 bpm的子分析没有显示出显着差异。结论:即使在绝对心律不齐的情况下,例如心房颤动,使用具有双重测量控制功能的电子设备测量血压也能提供准确的结果。舒张压值的最小差异在临床上并不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号