...
首页> 外文期刊>ANZ journal of surgery >Novel approach to aortic cannulation suturing: tangential suture technique.
【24h】

Novel approach to aortic cannulation suturing: tangential suture technique.

机译:主动脉插管缝合的新方法:切线缝合技术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Pursestring suture for ascending aortic cannulation in open heart surgery that requires cardiopulmonary bypass may cause serious events, especially in patients who have a thin or calcific aorta. We introduce a novel suturing method, called the 'tangential suture technique', and submit our clinical experience. Methods: Adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass were included in this study. Patients in whom the tangential suture technique was applied (Group A; n = 146) were compared with patients in whom the classic pursestring technique was applied (Group B; n = 152). Results: The age (38 +/- 11 years vs 36 +/- 10 years), sex (males 65.1% vs 62.5%) and operation types were similar in both groups. Although the difference was not significant (P > 0.05), subadventitial haematoma occurred more frequently in Group B (13 patients; 8.6%) than in Group A (3 patients; 2.1%). However, none in Group A required opening the adventitia. No aortic dissection was observed in peri- or postoperative periods in either group. In Group B, seven (4.6%) patients required repair by suture after tying of pursestring sutures following decannulation because of bleeding, while none was required in Group A (P = 0.0156). Conclusions: Tangential suture technique allows the needle to take a longer segment from the media layer while decreasing the likelihood of entering the lumen. Because the tract of the suture almost perfectly fits to the needle curve, tissue injury is less, even on fragile aortas, and this ensures more stable closure of the hole when the suture is tied following decannulation. By considering both its theoretical advantages and our clinical experience, we believe tangential suture technique should be preferred to the classic method.
机译:背景:在需要进行心肺旁路手术的开放式心脏手术中,用于升主动脉插管的缝合线缝合可能会引起严重事件,尤其是在主动脉薄或钙化的患者中。我们介绍一种新颖的缝合方法,称为“切线缝合技术”,并提交我们的临床经验。方法:本研究纳入了接受体外循环的成年患者。将采用切线缝合技术的患者(A组; n = 146)与采用经典皮筋缝合技术的患者(B组; n = 152)进行比较。结果:两组的年龄(38 +/- 11岁对36 +/- 10岁),性别(男性65.1%对62.5%)和手术类型相似。尽管差异不显着(P> 0.05),但与A组(3例; 2.1%)相比,B组(13例; 8.6%)更容易发生膜下血肿。但是,A组中没有一个要求打开外膜。两组患者在围手术期或术后均未观察到主动脉夹层。在B组中,有七名(4.6%)患者因出血而在进行无环切术后捆扎细绳缝合后需要通过缝合进行修复,而A组则不需要(P = 0.0156)。结论:切线缝合技术可使针头从介质层中取更长的一段,同时降低进入管腔的可能性。由于缝合线几乎完全适合针状曲线,因此即使在脆弱的主动脉上,组织损伤也更少,并且当缝合后再行缝合时,确保缝合线更稳定地闭合孔。考虑到其理论优势和我们的临床经验,我们认为切线缝合技术应优于传统方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号