首页> 外文期刊>Annals of family medicine >Quality of preventive care for diabetes: effects of visit frequency and competing demands.
【24h】

Quality of preventive care for diabetes: effects of visit frequency and competing demands.

机译:糖尿病预防保健的质量:就诊频率和竞争需求的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the association between timely receipt of diabetes-related preventive services and the longitudinal pattern of outpatient service use as characterized by a novel taxonomy that prioritized visits based on the Oregon State Prioritized Health Services List. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of mail survey and automated health care data for a population-based sample of patients with diabetes enrolled in a health maintenance organization in Washington State (N = 4,463). Outcomes included American Diabetes Association-recommended preventive services, including regular hemoglobin A(1C) (HbA(1C)) monitoring, retinal examination, and microalbuminuria screening. Patients with fewer than 8 visits during the 2-year study period were considered infrequent users, while patients with 8 or more visits were classified as lower-priority users if most visits were for conditions of relatively low rank on the Oregon list and as higher-priority users otherwise. RESULTS: After adjustment for social, demographic, and clinical factors, and depression, infrequent users had significantly reduced odds of receiving at least 1 HbA(1C) test (odds ratio [OR] = 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.51), retinal examination (OR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.63-0.86), and microalbuminuria screening (OR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.58-0.96) relative to higher-priority users during the previous year. Lower-priority users also had relatively reduced odds of receiving at least 1 HbA(1C) test (OR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.35-1.01), retinal examination (OR = 0.68, 95% CI, 0.56-0.84), and microalbuminuria screening (OR = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.57-1.09) despite attending a similar mean number of total visits as higher-priority users. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who attend relatively few outpatient visits or who attend more frequent visits for predominantly lower-priority conditions are more likely to receive substandard preventive care for diabetes.
机译:目的:我们试图确定及时接收与糖尿病有关的预防服务与门诊服务使用的纵向模式之间的关联,其特征在于一种新颖的分类法,该分类法根据俄勒冈州优先卫生服务清单对就诊进行了优先排序。方法:我们对华盛顿州一家健康维护组织(N = 4,463)登记的人群为基础的糖尿病患者样本进行了邮件调查和自动医疗数据的横断面分析。结果包括美国糖尿病协会推荐的预防服务,包括常规血红蛋白A(1C)(HbA(1C))监测,视网膜检查和微量白蛋白尿筛查。在2年研究期间访问次数少于8次的患者被视为不常使用,而如果访问次数最多的是俄勒冈州名单上相对较低的疾病,而访问次数最多的是8次以上的患者,则被归为优先级较低的用户。优先用户,否则。结果:在对社会,人口统计学和临床​​因素以及抑郁症进行调整后,不频繁的使用者接受至少1次HbA(1C)测试的几率大大降低(赔率[OR] = 0.35,95%置信区间[CI],0.24) -0.51),相对于上一年较高使用者的视网膜检查(OR = 0.74,95%CI,0.63-0.86)和微量白蛋白尿筛查(OR = 0.75,95%CI,0.58-0.96)。低优先级用户接受至少1次HbA(1C)测试(OR = 0.59,95%CI,0.35-1.01),视网膜检查(OR = 0.68,95%CI,0.56-0.84)的几率相对降低微量白蛋白尿筛查(OR = 0.79,95%CI,0.57-1.09),尽管总访问次数与高优先级用户相似。结论:门诊就诊次数相对较少或因主要是低优先级疾病而就诊次数较多的患者更有可能接受不合格的糖尿病预防保健。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号